| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 118/19 Given: 88/6 |
"After nuclear blast, N Korea fires missiles
By: AFP
Published: 26/05/2009 at 02:57 PM
North Korea reportedly fired two short-range missiles on Tuesday, in a move set to heighten tensions after its latest nuclear weapons test drew global condemnation.
The UN Security Council held an emergency meeting to consider the options after Pyongyang's test of a nuclear device on Monday.
The Council called the test a "clear violation" of international law and immediately began working on a resolution that could impose new sanctions on the secretive North, which has now tested two nuclear bombs in three years.
"This resolution should include new sanctions in addition to those already adopted because such behaviour should have a cost and a price to pay," said Jean-Pierre Lacroix, the deputy French ambassador to the United Nations.
Following the UN condemnation, the North launched one ground-to-air missile and one ground-to-ship missile into the sea Tuesday off its eastern coast near the city of Hamhung, South Korea's Yonhap news agency reported.
"Intelligence authorities are analysing the motives for the firing," it quoted a South Korean government source as saying, adding that each missile had a range of 130 kilometres (80 miles).
In April Pyongyang test-fired a long-range rocket that critics say was in fact a ballistic missile, and on Monday it test-fired three short-range missiles after the nuclear blast.
Russia estimated the force of Monday's underground nuclear explosion at up to 20 kilotons, almost as powerful as the atom bombs that flattened Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
But Martin Kalinowski, a professor at the Carl Friedrich von Weizsacker Centre for Science and Peace Research (ZNF), at the University of Hamburg, told AFP Tuesday: "The yield is about four kilotons, equivalent of TNT, with an uncertainty range from three to eight kilotons."
Tuesday's test provoked condemnation from across the world, with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon calling on the UN Security Council to take "the necessary measures" against North Korea.
Susan Rice, US ambassador to the United Nations, warned Pyongyang would "pay a price" if it continued to carry out nuclear and missile tests in violation of international law.
North Korea has repeatedly said it needs a deterrent to ward off an attack by the United States, which it believes wants to topple Kim Jong-Il's regime. Almost six years of disarmament talks have not stopped its nuclear drive.
Some analysts have suggested that Kim, 67, is using the nuclear test to strengthen his hand at home, and so could be even less swayed than usual by more sanctions or international criticism.
"This is part of Kim shoring up support for his regime among the inner circle and the public," Peter Beck, a Korea expert at the American University in Washington, told AFP.
"The internal domestic dynamic is taking precedence over external factors."
Asian and European foreign ministers on Tuesday jointly condemned the first test on Monday while France said it would back sanctions and Germany summoned the North Korean ambassador.
Even China, a permanent member of the Security Council and the North's sole main ally, was strongly critical.
"Disregarding the common objections of the international community, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea has again tested a nuclear device," China's foreign ministry said in a statement.
"The Chinese government expresses its resolute opposition to this," it said.
US President Barack Obama, whose initial overtures to the North since taking office in January have been met with official hostility from Pyongyang, condemned what he called its "reckless" atomic test.
The North Tuesday reiterated complaints that Obama is no better than his predecessor.
"The present US administration is talking about what it called a 'change' and 'bilateral dialogue' but it is, in actuality, pursuing the same reckless policy as followed by the former Bush administration to stifle the DPRK by force of arms," said the ruling party newspaper Rodong Sinmun.
The pro-Pyongyang Chosun Sinbo said Tuesday sanctions against the North would only escalate tensions and called for direct talks between the United States and North Korea.
"No matter how high the degree of pressure is raised against the DPRK, the DPRK will never change its current course," Chosun Sinbo said on its website."
That government just seems to get more and more scary.
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 0/0 Given: 0/0 |
It all comes down to one person's desperate cry for attention and recognition. I had to watch "Team America" one more time to remind myself how childish some world leaders can be.
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1/0 Given: 0/0 |
Hearing Obama condemn N Korea's act as reckless is laughable after US and the rest of the Nuclear Bomb holders testing of the past. Who gets to hold the gun. Now who suffers for it ? sanctions against who the people of NK. I think I have heard this all before.
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 0/0 Given: 0/0 |
Firstly the USA have not tested in decades so comparisons with the distant past - a past in which the world was in the middle of a cold war are not valid-Originally Posted by eagle
Considering that N Korea can hardly feed it's own people and is a nut job state which is one of the most dysfunctional and retarded it is a wonder at all that they should be bothering with Nukes.
There sadly is no solution to this mad state.The regime just wants to keep existing and short of a full nuke pre-emptive strike on the country and the ruthless wiping out of all of its military capability which would result in so much loss of life there is not much that can be done.
As for who gets to hold the gun? Well history decided that a long time ago! Most powerful nations get those choices.
USA = most powerful nation state by far. Morality or questions of right are wrong are basically irrelevant it just is. As bad as it might seem to have the USA as the most dominant nation state and leading power on this planet, one only has to look at some of the alternatives to see that things could be much worse!
I say ban all nukes- then lets ban armies- then war and then murder and then crime and then poverty etc etc etc etc. Sure it is simple really just lets wish it all away.
Now back to the real problem at hand? Well we have a nut job nations state testing nukes and long range missiles despite the fact that nobody has and intention or desire to attack them! What to do about such a state? Well maybe Eagle thinks we should just say that it is fine and dandy that N Korea should become a full blown nuke nation?
Maybe it is no big deal? But I doubt it and would prefer that such a nation not have any ability to cause problems outside its own borders
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1/0 Given: 0/0 |
allseasonman wrote:I didn't say they should have them but calling them reckless after the US showered Iraq with depleted uranium in 2 invasions killing and crippling Iraqis and US soldiers as we speak. Man is no where near together enough to handle Nukes. We are a reckless species and should all be banned from possessing weapons but hey then we would be beating each other with fists. For all the talk of NK we watch them test and are wary of China and it sounds like I've heard this all before.now back to the real problem at hand? Well we have a nut job nations state testing nukes and long range missiles despite the fact that nobody has and intention or desire to attack them! What to do about such a state? Well maybe Eagle thinks we should just say that it is fine and dandy that N Korea should become a full blown nuke nation?
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3/7 Given: 0/0 |
Originally Posted by eagle
You have heard it all before.
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 0/2 Given: 0/0 |
Eagle does have a good point. Obama looks pretty ridiculous saying that North Korea is breaking international laws when the US has literally thousands of nuclear missiles.
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1/0 Given: 0/0 |
The west is in a no-win situation when it comes to that nutter in NK...he is a bad tempered spoilt brat - for all his 67 years...
The problem is that even when the west is clearly not interested in attacking the place, he drums up attention by taking provocative steps. If we ignore the prat, he jumps up and down and screams, and if we don't then we are fulfilling his rhetoric to the people in NK that the west wants to attack them...
No - we don't - in fact, we don't even want to go to your drab cold shit-hole country - the problem is that the people of the place are so brainwashed by the military (democratic - yeah right!) government there, that they daren't take a crap without asking for permission in triplicate... ok I'm exagerating...but they really are told complete rubbish about the west...
I recall seeing a doco where the kids in school hated America because in America they kill and eat children...!!! No joke...
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 73/6 Given: 23/0 |
well problem is during the cold war (and yeah i'm old enough to remember it) nuclear weapons were described as a deterrent and not as offensive weapons.Originally Posted by Neo
now i have no wish to see iran, n. korea, syria or whoever have nuclear weapons, but if india, pakistan (FFS), israel etc r allowed to have them, it does come across as a tad hypocritical !!
and after what happened to iraq u can understand why they might want them as a DETERRENT !!!!
| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 0/2 Given: 0/0 |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't the cold war ended already? Quite a long time ago as I recall. 8)Originally Posted by CiaranM
Bookmarks