real fashion victims! Entry posted by XCHANELX · April 15, 2009 383 views Share More sharing options... Followers 0 cruel............... http://www.wackyarchives.com/offbeat/tattooed-oinkers.html Report Entry
XCHANELX 1 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share cruel............... http://www.wackyarchives.com/offbeat/tattooed-oinkers.html Quote Link to comment
Greggo 0 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share People have way too much time on their hands Quote Link to comment
SweetieBabie 5 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share I had seen this Belgian artist's tattooed pigs at Chanel Mobile Art last year in Hongkong, where he also used the pig hide around stomach to make Chanel 2.55 bag, imagine a bag with pig nipples. Gave me a bit ikky feeling, but that's art. Quote Link to comment
XCHANELX 1 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Oo.Cloud.oO ~ oink Greggo ~ tell me about it SweetieBabie ~ i dont agree with you on this one, this is not art.........art being done on a live animal such as this example is not art to me it's like an experiment, "since they?re sedated and they?re less likely to be butchered"????? so does it means it is ok to torture for art? i wonder how would the artist himself like.........if her were to be sedated against his will, and 3-4 artist tattooed him from head to toe? just because the animal cant fight back/refuse or even if it meant to be butchered after it doesnt mean that this is the right thing to do humanly.........i can understand if it is done on a piece of hide.....just my 2cents Quote Link to comment
thelostring 0 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Well... dont know what to say ... Quote Link to comment
eagle 1 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share Well she's naked but not what I had in mind ? Quote Link to comment
XCHANELX 1 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share ay loca..........eagle i will subscribe to one of those s&m hanky panky site for u so u dont have to ask me for sexy pics every time i post a journal lmao Quote Link to comment
SweetieBabie 5 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share I do not disagree this is definitely an animal cruelty, it was more like a shocking factor really when i was walking into a fashion exhibition and was not expected to see something like that at all. I could imagine it'd piss off so many animal right activists. May be the "artist" gave his a new metaphor to consumerism, i do not know. http://dannydaily.typepad.com/danny_daily/images/2008/09/29/chanel.jpg Quote Link to comment
XCHANELX 1 Posted April 15, 2009 Report Share SweetieBabie ~ oh ok boo boo u scared me for a hot minute there ....... i mean how in the world would any artist in their right mind even think/view this as a form of art......bad enough to kill hundreds of animals for its fur.....in this case it's pure cruelty Quote Link to comment
Nuchieee 0 Posted April 16, 2009 Report Share Posted by Greggo [ 15 April 2009 | 8:24PM ] People have way too much time on their hands indeed Quote Link to comment
0 Comments
Recommended Comments