Jump to content
  • entries
    76
  • comments
    0
  • views
    6281

Caesars loses domain fight with Thai massage parlor


FarangFarang

1597 views

 Share

CAESARS’ RUB-AND-TUG-OF-WAR WITH THAI MASSAGE PARLOR

Caesars must really feel like flocks of incontinent homing pigeons are bearing down from above. For instance, it just lost a domain name squabble with a massage parlor in Thailand. (Read the decision here.) As originally reported by Thedomains.com, Caesars World, Inc. had filed a complaint with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) regarding a Bangkok massage parlor run by a firm called P.T. Complex Ltd. The “upscale” rub-and-tug joint had operated under the name Cleopatra up until 1997, after which it changed its name to Caesars Entertainment and in May 2001, registered the URL caesarsentertainment.com. (Screenshot of the current home page depicted below: “Meet many cute and beautiful girls and be served with various and full services.”)

The fact that as late as 2001, Caesars (the casino) had not yet locked up its domain names recalls the kind of forward thinking that convinced CEO Gary Loveman to turn down the opportunity to pursue a casino license in Macau. (To be fair, the pre-Harrah’s Caesars didn’t add the ‘Entertainment’ suffix until 2003.) Nonetheless, by 2008 Caesars decided they better do something about this newfangled interwebby thing and filed suit in the Intellectual Property and International Trade Court of Thailand to revoke Thai service marks P.T. Complex had registered under the Caesars name. In January 2012, the Court cancelled those service mark registrations, but in April, both parties appealed the decision on separate grounds, which had the effect of staying the Court’s decision until the appeals are considered.

As such, a one-man panel of ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) dismissed the application by Caesars (the casino) to transfer control of the domain. The UDRP panel went on to say that Caesars was fully aware that the Court’s decision had been stayed, yet omitted this info in its UDRP complaint. The Panel stated that Caesars having “not presented complete and accurate information” was “in itself a reason to deny the complaint.” In the meantime, if you happen to find yourself in the Bangkok Caesars lying flat on a table wearing nothing but a towel, don’t forget to ask your charming hostess how much she wants for ‘the Loveman.’

http://calvinayre.com/2012/08/18/casino/caesars-loses-domain-fight-with-thai-massage-parlor/

This story had be cracking up. LOL

 Share

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

CAESARS’ RUB-AND-TUG-OF-WAR WITH THAI MASSAGE PARLOR

Caesars must really feel like flocks of incontinent homing pigeons are bearing down from above. For instance, it just lost a domain name squabble with a massage parlor in Thailand. (Read the decision here.) As originally reported by Thedomains.com, Caesars World, Inc. had filed a complaint with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) regarding a Bangkok massage parlor run by a firm called P.T. Complex Ltd. The “upscale” rub-and-tug joint had operated under the name Cleopatra up until 1997, after which it changed its name to Caesars Entertainment and in May 2001, registered the URL caesarsentertainment.com. (Screenshot of the current home page depicted below: “Meet many cute and beautiful girls and be served with various and full services.”)

The fact that as late as 2001, Caesars (the casino) had not yet locked up its domain names recalls the kind of forward thinking that convinced CEO Gary Loveman to turn down the opportunity to pursue a casino license in Macau. (To be fair, the pre-Harrah’s Caesars didn’t add the ‘Entertainment’ suffix until 2003.) Nonetheless, by 2008 Caesars decided they better do something about this newfangled interwebby thing and filed suit in the Intellectual Property and International Trade Court of Thailand to revoke Thai service marks P.T. Complex had registered under the Caesars name. In January 2012, the Court cancelled those service mark registrations, but in April, both parties appealed the decision on separate grounds, which had the effect of staying the Court’s decision until the appeals are considered.

As such, a one-man panel of ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP) dismissed the application by Caesars (the casino) to transfer control of the domain. The UDRP panel went on to say that Caesars was fully aware that the Court’s decision had been stayed, yet omitted this info in its UDRP complaint. The Panel stated that Caesars having “not presented complete and accurate information” was “in itself a reason to deny the complaint.” In the meantime, if you happen to find yourself in the Bangkok Caesars lying flat on a table wearing nothing but a towel, don’t forget to ask your charming hostess how much she wants for ‘the Loveman.’

http://calvinayre.com/2012/08/18/casino/caesars-loses-domain-fight-with-thai-massage-parlor/

This story had be cracking up. LOL

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...