s1lv3rtwenty2 Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 fact or fiction: all other things being equal, a man will always choose the girl that he thinks is more physically attractive? truth or lie? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttesta Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 I think in some cases it's true...really! :? I mean in general if you are physically attractive people will treat you more nicely than they do to less good looking people. Not being cocky or anything but I don't know, I only judge from my limited personal experience. Maybe I was wrong. :roll: But I think in reality personality plays a very important role. No matter how good looking the person is if she behaves badly or treat other people unfairly, she'd not normally be chosen. ( I mean for smart guys, because it's not gonna work out anyway. Unless you're dating her looks, not her personality) :wink: But with the same package (personality) I think beauty is like a bonus. Let's say if there are two girls: 1. plain looking and super nice 2. gorgeous and super nice What do you guys choose? Noochy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bored Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 Q: Does beauty always win out? A: No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamHotel Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 ... if I was my son, that is But for one I actually fully endorse what Pretty Exotic you had to say.. No flattery here jing.... and by the way, have anyone told you that your hmmmm....personality...well.... Ok, I go now :cry: Bye 8) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babyoiy Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 I think if we fall in love someone she/he is always beautiful in our sight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 3 comments: a) all things are *never* equal if we let all things be equal except physical appearance, including interest level then yeah the guy would choose the physically more attractive woman, and the woman the physically more attractive man. in fact i believe if all things were equal except for *any* one quality then most ppl would choose the slightly 'better' version. c) in reality it's more like there are tradeoffs, and most ppl make choices based on a variety of reasons--for instance in my opinion someone interesting will get better looking to you as you get to know them, but someone good looking won't necessarily get more interesting (but when they do.. .WOW) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
top_dude Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 all other things being equal, a man will always choose the girl that he thinks is more physically attractive? I'm with Zeus here.... If ALL other things were TRULY equal then why not take the more attractive option? my view... being an old man ;-) .... "Don't you draw the Queen of Diamonds boy, she'll beat you if she's able, you know the Queen of Hearts is always your best bet.." The Eagles, Desperado. "There will always be pretty girls. There will only be one soulmate." top_dude Cheers td Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted October 5, 2004 Report Share Posted October 5, 2004 i would qualify what topdude said about soulmates in that there can only be one at a time :wink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ling_dtua_khaao Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 no seriously...utter nonsense.......bautiful woman will noly make you cry ...**** em (but don;t date em !!!) But Slurms I've never made your cry... don't be silly. Sometimes, beautiful look comes with beautiful inside like me :wink: Well, let's ask to see if you're right. Slurms, was she beautiful inside? --Ling ·ÃÅÖè§ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnno Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 how deep and meaningful is this discussion? beauty is in the eye of the beholder i've seen some beautiful people, beautiful to look at. but then they open their mouth and it doesn't take long to see that there is nothing at all inside that beautiful head. talk to an average looking woman and be amazed with the knowledge. which one would you rather be with for longer then 30 minutes? i rest my case your honor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ling_dtua_khaao Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 which one would you rather be with for longer then 30 minutes? Maybe you should change the question to "longer than one hot night"? Then I think you'll get the answer you want.--Ling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 yeah, i think ask me when i come up for air---48 hours or so?? LOL which one would you rather be with for longer then 30 minutes? Maybe you should change the question to "longer than one hot night"? Then I think you'll get the answer you want.--Ling Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnno Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 very shallow answer no, on second thoughts, if it takes you 48 hours, you must have been deep my humble apologies, you lucky bastard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted October 6, 2004 Report Share Posted October 6, 2004 i have a theory: men have two heads. they don't both work at the same time :wink: when it comes right down to it, for hour 49 onwards (after 49 hours it's a long-term relationship LOL) then i go for interesting person above all else. when it came right down to it in real-life choosing of real-life gf i chose a smart and interesting filmmaker over a smart and not-quite-as interesting (but rich, and arguably better looking) banker. after 4 years it didnt work out but i do think she was the best choice for me. (in real life all things are *never* equal). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farang4U Posted October 7, 2004 Report Share Posted October 7, 2004 Q: Does beauty always win out?A: No. Bore I don't belive ya coz I can see that u pick my friend lol Don't u think she is attractive? HOHOHOHO And i agree with ya. Answer is nooo for sure Coz i got some fanclub in here lol :oops: Im not so attractive (ugly) but some ppl like me coz Im nice to them And some of ppl that I like also not look attractive but their heart more attractive than some good looking person :idea: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aphrodite Posted October 8, 2004 Report Share Posted October 8, 2004 But with the same package (personality) I think beauty is like a bonus. Let's say if there are two girls: 1. plain looking and super nice 2. gorgeous and super nice What do you guys choose? Noochy Can I be ur choice no 2 hahaha.. but hey that doesnt mean i would get a guy easily. There was a guy who dumped me for a fugly woman just cos shes so f**king good in bed (he told me so) and cos i didnt wanna sleep with him. what an emotional fuckwit dont u think? anyway my point here is that some guys dont even care if that girl is beautiful or not as long as shes got boobs, thats all fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted October 9, 2004 Report Share Posted October 9, 2004 for me beauty alone won't last more than 13 days, but brains can get my attention as quickly, or even more, than beauty, esp if she is funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cerberus1264 Posted October 9, 2004 Report Share Posted October 9, 2004 :twisted: ......We all know that beauty is only skin deep.... But uglyness goes right to the bone.....LOL :twisted: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted October 9, 2004 Report Share Posted October 9, 2004 aaahhhhh but u r taken, so my heart is breakin'... :wink: for me beauty alone won't last more than 13 days, but brains can get my attention as quickly, or even more, than beauty, esp if she is funny. Hmmmmmmmm I think... you are talking about "ME" :shock: lol C :wink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabaisabai Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Depends on which beauty u talk about.. Beauty on the insides always win..(not at first)...but at the end. We just like to be lied to..at first (thats why most people judge someone by their first impression) hey...thats a good tread for the forum: first impression? important or not! anyways... we let the (painfull) truth hits us later.. this is no poetry...just the plain truth! :wink: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabaisabai Posted October 28, 2004 Report Share Posted October 28, 2004 Beauty will definitely catch the guy's eyes at first, but after sometime, once he realise that you have only beauty, then he'll just get bored and probably off with others girls. Beauty win over for awhile, but over the long run, brain that keeps the guys curious and wanting more... I agree with u so what about the gurls? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Solieri Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 'Your Honour' just because a girl is beautiful, does not mean she's boring or stupid. I will agree, that sometimes this is indeed the case. I don't believe I'm beautiful, but I have been in 3 long term relationships since I was 18 years old - and I'm almost 36. And I have been the one to end every relationship. I pose this question to you - do you think less attractive women are better in the sack? Let's take Prince Charles and Princess Diana vs Camilla Parker-Bowles. Charles ultimately wanted Camilla. Does this mean she's better in bed? Or does she just keep him interested with her wit, intelligence and charm? ;-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiaranM Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 I pose this question to you - do you think less attractive women are better in the sack? Let's take Prince Charles and Princess Diana vs Camilla Parker-Bowles. Charles ultimately wanted Camilla. Does this mean she's better in bed? Or does she just keep him interested with her wit, intelligence and charm?;-) or is charles just a dumb fuckwit ???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English_Bob Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 In the spirit of fairness and equality, I've banged a whole bunch of women; mingers and stunners and everywhere in between. I've banged 'em indoors and outdoors (sometimes half in and half out when they were trying to escape). I've banged them singly or in pairs. I've banged them tenderly or banged them like shithouse doors in hurricanes. I've banged them in ways that are illegal in many parts of the world. This is my verdict... Women can be good in the sack whether they are beautiful or ugly. It comes down to confidence. Confidence is often as a result of practice and/or good self-image. Hot women get the opportunity to practice sex more often and are usually more confident than ugly girls. Therefore it stands to reason that hot girls are the better choice for good sex. A more valid reason for picking hot girls over ugly girls is that they are hot, not ugly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgwhynot Posted January 28, 2012 Report Share Posted January 28, 2012 Us guys are very visual creatures. But in the end physical beauty is only part of the equation. We need more than that to keep us in a long term relationship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.