Jump to content
  • entries
    388
  • comments
    0
  • views
    7547

Why Do They Hate Us


Bruce551

260 views

 Share

 

Siamese squeeze

 

 

By David Warren, The Ottawa CitizenMay 22, 2010

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Siamese+squeeze/3059273/story.html

There is much to be said for ignorance. My reader is to understand I don't mean a mere inability to answer the sort of quiz questions that can be graded to generate educational statistics. No, I mean a more thorough, peasant ignorance of the way the world works, and in particular, of the way it works today.

Or alternatively, let's say: there is much to be said for freedom from a world-weary cynicism; and from all the spite, malice, and violent reprisal that it spawns.

I have been thinking this in relation to Thailand: a country that was once my second home. Or let us call it Siam: the name was changed for very political reasons on June 23, 1939, changed back after the world war, then changed to Thailand again in 1949. When people start changing the names of things, you know trouble is brewing.

My acquaintance with the country goes back to childhood, when my father was working as an adviser to the Royal Thai Government, under the auspices of the International Labour Organization, doing a job that, in retrospect, should never have been done. That was: identifying craft skills involved in traditional Siamese handicraft manufacture, that could be adapted through machine production to the requirements of modern industrial design.

In retrospect, I cannot think of a faster way to make a contented people unhappy, unless it was teaching them to read and write. For, as Stephen Leacock once observed, it is by such means the poor are enabled to hold a mirror up to their condition, and have a good look.

As the old Siamese saying went, there was "rice in the fields and fish in the streams." (Except during the monsoon, vice versa.) Hunger was not an issue, and it is not a country that gets very cold. Every glimpse I ever had of this traditional, "backward" Siam, her people, their homes, the temples, and their monks, was of a kind of earthly paradise. Why not leave them alone?

This paradise was transformed, through the miracle of Asian Tiger economics, with its infrastructure of high finance and low party politics. Bangkok, in particular, has been transformed through the two generations since I first saw it, from "Venice of the East" with its wats and klongs, to a high-tech rat cage holding 15 million souls; perhaps a third of those sweating out an existence under tropical solar in tin-shack slums.

At some point during the Enlightenment in our West -- since exported globally -- we began to take for granted the purpose of life was to achieve material "progress." The older notion, whether Christian or Buddhist (or anything else), that life served some form of spiritual redemption, resurfaces occasionally, though in a way almost facetiously wistful. (There is an ancient proverb, that a man cannot serve two masters.)

Since I wrote my column on Wednesday, on the Red Shirt invasion of Bangkok, the troops went in to put an end to it. The Red Shirt leaders were captured, and their rank and file scattered like a grease fire by a sledge of water. It was interesting to see what they set fire to, in the course of being mopped up. Their principal achievement was reducing the country's leading department store complex -- symbol of technology, wealth, and high fashion -- to a smouldering ruin.

There were several dozen other major hits, performed by these people from the country's North and Northeast, who began by resenting the way Bangkok governments overlooked their own wants and needs, and became increasingly vexed as the politicians they elected were removed from power, at the request of Bangkok's Yellow Shirt mobs. The idea of forming their own mobs eventually occurred to them.

The arsonists also targeted banks, the country's stock exchange, and the leading TV studio. To their great surprise, the staff of the Bangkok Post also found their building surrounded, and the journalists fled for their lives.

I was amused by the response of one of them to an e-mail. It was the classic liberal refrain: "But we're just reporting the news! Why do they hate us?" This from a paper that blames Red Shirt leaders for everything, and speaks of their followers as if they are beasts of burden.

I could not help thinking of a North American analogy. It would be a Tea Party invasion of lower Manhattan, setting fires at Macy's and up and down Wall Street. And then they surround the New York Times building. And the paper's reporters, milling through the debris, saying, "But we were just reporting the news! Why do these drooling Republican hicks from the Flyover Country hate us so?"

Far, far, more could be said, about the fate of peoples who become disenfranchised by the swell of "progress" and its vanguard elites. In the meantime, it is worth holding a mirror up to Siam, renamed Thailand, and having a good look.

David Warren's column appears Sundays, Wednesdays and Saturdays.

© Copyright © The Ottawa Citizen

 

 

 Share

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

 

Siamese squeeze

 

 

By David Warren, The Ottawa CitizenMay 22, 2010

http://www.ottawacitizen.com/Siamese+squeeze/3059273/story.html

There is much to be said for ignorance. My reader is to understand I don't mean a mere inability to answer the sort of quiz questions that can be graded to generate educational statistics. No, I mean a more thorough, peasant ignorance of the way the world works, and in particular, of the way it works today.

Or alternatively, let's say: there is much to be said for freedom from a world-weary cynicism; and from all the spite, malice, and violent reprisal that it spawns.

I have been thinking this in relation to Thailand: a country that was once my second home. Or let us call it Siam: the name was changed for very political reasons on June 23, 1939, changed back after the world war, then changed to Thailand again in 1949. When people start changing the names of things, you know trouble is brewing.

My acquaintance with the country goes back to childhood, when my father was working as an adviser to the Royal Thai Government, under the auspices of the International Labour Organization, doing a job that, in retrospect, should never have been done. That was: identifying craft skills involved in traditional Siamese handicraft manufacture, that could be adapted through machine production to the requirements of modern industrial design.

In retrospect, I cannot think of a faster way to make a contented people unhappy, unless it was teaching them to read and write. For, as Stephen Leacock once observed, it is by such means the poor are enabled to hold a mirror up to their condition, and have a good look.

As the old Siamese saying went, there was "rice in the fields and fish in the streams." (Except during the monsoon, vice versa.) Hunger was not an issue, and it is not a country that gets very cold. Every glimpse I ever had of this traditional, "backward" Siam, her people, their homes, the temples, and their monks, was of a kind of earthly paradise. Why not leave them alone?

This paradise was transformed, through the miracle of Asian Tiger economics, with its infrastructure of high finance and low party politics. Bangkok, in particular, has been transformed through the two generations since I first saw it, from "Venice of the East" with its wats and klongs, to a high-tech rat cage holding 15 million souls; perhaps a third of those sweating out an existence under tropical solar in tin-shack slums.

At some point during the Enlightenment in our West -- since exported globally -- we began to take for granted the purpose of life was to achieve material "progress." The older notion, whether Christian or Buddhist (or anything else), that life served some form of spiritual redemption, resurfaces occasionally, though in a way almost facetiously wistful. (There is an ancient proverb, that a man cannot serve two masters.)

Since I wrote my column on Wednesday, on the Red Shirt invasion of Bangkok, the troops went in to put an end to it. The Red Shirt leaders were captured, and their rank and file scattered like a grease fire by a sledge of water. It was interesting to see what they set fire to, in the course of being mopped up. Their principal achievement was reducing the country's leading department store complex -- symbol of technology, wealth, and high fashion -- to a smouldering ruin.

There were several dozen other major hits, performed by these people from the country's North and Northeast, who began by resenting the way Bangkok governments overlooked their own wants and needs, and became increasingly vexed as the politicians they elected were removed from power, at the request of Bangkok's Yellow Shirt mobs. The idea of forming their own mobs eventually occurred to them.

The arsonists also targeted banks, the country's stock exchange, and the leading TV studio. To their great surprise, the staff of the Bangkok Post also found their building surrounded, and the journalists fled for their lives.

I was amused by the response of one of them to an e-mail. It was the classic liberal refrain: "But we're just reporting the news! Why do they hate us?" This from a paper that blames Red Shirt leaders for everything, and speaks of their followers as if they are beasts of burden.

I could not help thinking of a North American analogy. It would be a Tea Party invasion of lower Manhattan, setting fires at Macy's and up and down Wall Street. And then they surround the New York Times building. And the paper's reporters, milling through the debris, saying, "But we were just reporting the news! Why do these drooling Republican hicks from the Flyover Country hate us so?"

Far, far, more could be said, about the fate of peoples who become disenfranchised by the swell of "progress" and its vanguard elites. In the meantime, it is worth holding a mirror up to Siam, renamed Thailand, and having a good look.

David Warren's column appears Sundays, Wednesdays and Saturdays.

© Copyright © The Ottawa Citizen

 

 

Link to comment

really? if only it was as simple as that. i guess this article served its purpose, to fill the inside pages of the ottawa citizen that day. forget about takkys real purpose in starting this blockading of bangkok. couldn't takky qualify as a "vanguard elite"? i don't thik there would be many richer people in thailand than him.

Link to comment

I often think that the ones who should really be complaining about democracy here are the Bangkok Thais, who would almost never be offered 500 or 1000 baht for their vote, as those up country are used to...oh...thats right, its illegal to do that now, you can only promise to use government money to pay every village that votes for you a nice million baht fee (of course you can tell villages that did not vote for you to go for a long walk off a short rice barge).

Link to comment

the classic liberal refrain? give me a break.

The Bangkok Post publishes columns that are critical of the Reds, but also publishes columns by Suranand Vejjajiva, Thitinan Pongsudhirak, Nattaporn Devakula and others who are as Red as they come.

It seems that unless a paper or tv station reports only 100% pro Red news, then they must be physically attacked and burned down.

That's Red democracy.

Link to comment

what i've heard is that the reds actually meant to attack a thai newspaper right next door to the post. brilliant.

this editorial is typical of western thinking--if any kind of rioting in 'less advanced' countries can possibly be kluged into the romantic archetype of class struggle leading to equality and freedom, it will, facts and even statements of parties involved be damned to obscurity.

that said, the socieconomic issues are real. the whitey press' interpretation of what's going on here, on the other hand, is cringworthy in its oversimplification to fit the assigned fairy tale.

Link to comment

I think everyone made good points regarding the western media, vote buying, and Thaksin and the opportunistic Red Shirts leadership. Still the people of Isan, North Thailand, and poor Bangkok Thai have real grievances.

I live in Chiang Mai. The air pollution here is very bad. Nothing has been done by the Bangkok Government to fix the air problem in the last 5 years. The Mae Ping river is polluted from chemicals from used by farmers and by the craft industry. There's still no mass transit system.

What does the Bangkok Gov. do? They upgrade the CM airport, cost 2 Billion Baht. The Gov. buget for air quality is less than 2 million baht. The Thai citizen welfare always seems to be the lowest priority of the National Gov.

Link to comment

Chiang Mai has been electing TRT and PT representatives to Parliament for the past ten years.

Have those representatives been fighting to do something about the problems you are talking about, Bruce?

If not, why not? If yes, why are they getting nowhere?

Link to comment

Good point, Robert. But, the Tourist industry has lost billions of Baht because of Chiang Mai Air Pollution. CM Chamber of Commerce has brought this issue to the attention of PM Abhisit and other Gov. Ministers, Health and Tourism. Interested to know if PT MPs tried to address this problem in parliament.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...