Guest Tattoodude Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 only because i read the article. i took it as a deliberate attempt to deceive; i'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that your'e not that illiterate. you should thank me for that I'm sorry ...but re-reading it I don't know how the hell anyone could conclude that was a direct quote. Maybe because you made reference to him in the third person. HE Geddit? For fucks sake even I know that and I'm brain dead. HEY! I just owned you again! WHOOOAAAAAAA Big day! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Why would I need to lie ? Are you guys implying that I'm wrong in saying all his thoery claims to prove is that it might be possible that the buildgins fell without bombs ? does it prove it fell without bombs ? bullshit !!! nice try at a character assisination by calling me a liar...but to be truly honest it makes no ******* difference (even if I was trying to lie) to the content and context of the ******* argument .It remains as valid whether he directly said this or not (which I'm not trying to claim he directly said!!!!) ..so what's the ******* point of me lying ? Whether he said it or not the point remains exactly the ******* same and in it's stongest form !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 i'd conclude that if it wasn't a direct you inappropriately used quote marks, had never written a term paper, and should fail high school english This is a university exam ? Got my degree in honours thanks , including second year English thrown in there . Go look around the way I've posted on these forums..I've used that form a million times ..just like people would in life when making the gestures with their two fingers ...it's informal ...I write exactly like I speak to keep the emotive content...I feel this shows I actually have quite good grasp on the language so that I can play around with it creatively ... I suppose you think I have poor vocab too and no grasp on the english language ? You , and many , many people have complimented me on various pieces of writing before , so that's a new and interesting approach . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiaranM Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Hey you think maybe Slurms is dumber than me? yep !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tattoodude Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Why would I need to lie ? Are you guys implying that I'm wrong in saying all his thoery claims to prove is that it might be possible that the buildgins fell without bombs ?does it prove it fell without bombs ? bullshit !!! nice try at a character assisination by calling me a liar...but to be truly honest it makes no f*cking difference (even if I was trying to lie) to the content and context of the f*cking argument .It remains as valid whether he directly said this or not (which I'm not trying to claim he directly said!!!!) ..so what's the f*cking point of me lying ? Whether he said it or not the point remains exactly the f*cking same and in it's stongest form !!!! Hey I dont claim to know why you lied, I just know you lied. Maybe you cant cum when your wacking off behind your keyboard at work if your not deceiving anyone by being something your not? Maybe your just a *****. Anyone else got any suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Why would I need to lie ? Are you guys implying that I'm wrong in saying all his thoery claims to prove is that it might be possible that the buildgins fell without bombs ? i'm saying that you manipulate everything to make it *look* like it supports your case. that, little boy, is a LIE. does it prove it fell without bombs ? and who said it did? your post proves quite nicely, however, that you misrepresented the article. deliberately, i'd imagine. bullshit !!! sorry, you can only claim you were bullshitting if you didn't intend to deceive. nice try at a character assisination by calling me a liar...but to be truly honest it makes no f*cking difference (even if I was trying to lie) to the content and context of the f*cking argument .It remains as valid whether he directly said this or not (which I'm not trying to claim he directly said!!!!) ..so what's the f*cking point of me lying ? Whether he said it or not the point remains exactly the f*cking same and in it's stongest form !!!! don't have to TRY to assassinate your character, little boy. you shot yourself in the foot again. if it makes no difference to your argument, then why misrepresent the article? maybe, just maybe, so other illiterates will think the article supports what your'e saying? nice try, but not that nice. ham-handed, really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 i'd conclude that if it wasn't a direct you inappropriately used quote marks, had never written a term paper, and should fail high school english This is a university exam ? Go look around the way I've posted on these forums..I've used that form a million times ..just like people would in life when making the gestures with their two fingers ...it's informal ...I write exactly like I speak to keep the emotive content...I feel this shows I actually have quite good grasp on the language so that I can play around with it creatively ... i have looked at the way you post in the forum. you have made several attempts to deceive and manipulate, this is merely the most obvious. I suppose you think I have poor vocab too and no grasp on the english language ? You , and many , many people have complimented me on various pieces of writing before , so that's a new and interesting approach . no, i already addressed that point. i discounted that explanation and concluded that you lied. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_love_som_tam Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 It proves your a liar. no it proves you're a dumb f*ck for not knowing it's common to frame an argument in quote boxes.....not that it requires any f*cking proof... there ya go... back to the old ways of resorting to profanity and name calling when you get busted. :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 sorry, you can only claim you were bullshitting if you didn't intend to deceive. Crap .As I said there is absolutely no reason to make it look like this is a direct quote , as it would in no way make my argument stronger or weaker . Do you suggest the author would disagree that in anyway his argument proves that the world trade centre fell without bombs ? Sanity please people . don't have to TRY to assassinate your character, little boy. you shot yourself in the foot again. Never once have I insulted you or anyone personally in relation to your age , appearance etc etc etc....please afford me the same respect . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
i_love_som_tam Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 "matter is both lost and conserved in black holes" the only black hole is where your head is at? need a flashlight? some air freshener perhaps? :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 there ya go... back to the old ways of resorting to profanity and name calling when you get busted. I'm resorting to that because he's trying to imply I lied , when in no shape , form or stretch of the imagination did I . The strongest case zeus is offering is that it looks like I tried to make think one thing . (A thing by the way that he admits is true...that in no way does it at all prove "pancake" theory is correct...it just tries to prove that bombs are not the only possible explanation ) on the life of my mother , father , ancestors unborn children , and anyone I ever cared about ...I did NOT think anyone would confuse that as a direct quote...but meant it as my way if displaying the gist of his argument...I've done the same thing a million times before and no one has ever confused it for a direct quote... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 sorry, you can only claim you were bullshitting if you didn't intend to deceive. Crap .As I said there is absolutely no reason to make it look like this is a direct quote , as it would in no way make my argument stronger or weaker . there's an obvious reason. you wrote your post to make it looks like it supports what you're saying, whereas in reality it doesn't. don't have to TRY to assassinate your character, little boy. you shot yourself in the foot again. Never once have I insulted you or anyone personally in relation to your age , appearance etc etc etc....please afford me the same respect . i am calling you a liar because you lied. it's right there on the page. not the first example of you twisting a text around to make it *seem* like it supports what you're saying, just the most obvious. i am calling you a little boy entirely because you're spitting the dummy in the forum; that , too, is right on the page. not anything to do with you personally. except insofar as what you write reflects who you are (does it?) if you'll recall we've never met, so what do i know about you, other than what you write? i am affording you the respect you are earning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 the only black hole is where your head is at? need a flashlight? some air freshener perhaps? Not one single argument I've made here regarding the hypocrisy of people who believe pancake theory calling others idiots has recieved any reasonable answer from any of you . If I'm so stupid , then I'd hate to know what that qualifies you as . To be honest , with the exception of Loburt and Zeus and maybe Piant I don't think much of the intellect of the rest of you posting here (tat and crew) , or find you very credible judges of intelligence . So fire away with this line of attack and watch as I ignore you as i'd ignore an annoying baby seal... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 whereas in reality it doesn't. How exactly doesn't it ? does his theory claim to prove anything or only to prove the possibility of the tower falling without bombs . The POSSIBILITY ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 i am calling you a liar because you lied. it's right there on the page. Well if the only options are that one of us is lying .....and I've sworn on everything I love and care about it's not me as I never intended or thought anyone would possibly think that was a direct quote...(did you Zeus , even beofee you read the argument ? Did anyone think it was a direct quote ?? .if so I'd like you to swear on everything you care about that's the impression you got (tat2dude not included as frankly he's quite thick and obviously frequently confused by the simple things)....after which I'll have no choice but to admit my writing style was misreprentative ..but far from a lie !!! ......(not that it makes any difference to my argument which still remains just as valid) .....besides...I'm pretty damn sure most of you knew it wasn't a direct quote and because mostly I've had my own way this whole forum and you are resorting to low blows to try and gain some levage.......even though changing the context or making assumptions about my intentiosn doesn't change the damn argument in one single way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 i am calling you a liar because you lied. it's right there on the page. Well if the only options are that one of us is lying .....and I've sworn on everything I love and care about it's not me as I never intended or thought anyone would possibly think that was a direct quote...(did you Zeus , even beofee you read the argument ? Did anyone think it was a direct quote ?? .if so I'd like you to swear on everything you care about that's the impression you got (tat2dude not included as frankly he's quite thick and obviously frequently confused by the simple things)....after which I'll have no choice but to admit my writing style was misreprentative ..but far from a lie !!! ......(not that it makes any difference to my argument which still remains just as valid) .....besides...I'm pretty damn sure most of you knew it wasn't a direct quote and because mostly I've had my own way this whole forum and you are resorting to low blows to try and gain some levage.......even though changing the context or making assumptions about my intentiosn doesn't change the damn argument in one single way... alright, then. you're illiterate. sorry for giving you too much credit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 you're missing the point, as usual. putting quote marks around it makes it look, to someone who can't be bothered to read the article, like a direct quote.. why the hell would they not read the whole article...and if they didn't how the **** should they feel qualified to comment on it ? bullshit man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 you're missing the point, as usual. putting quote marks around it makes it look, to someone who can't be bothered to read the article, like a direct quote.. why the hell would they not read the whole article...and if they didn't how the f*ck should they feel qualified to comment on it ? bullshit man! RIIIIGHT. you're not trying to persuade *anyone* in the cheap seats. :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 alright, then. you're illiterate. sorry for giving you too much credit. for using punctuation "wrong" (in your opinion) in a internet forum ? er ..please re-read what you just posted with special attention to certain lack of capital letters ...are you too illiterate ? RIIIIGHT. you're not trying to persuade *anyone* in the cheap seats. The cheap seats give a a **** , or even slightly understand a damn thing about the scientific method ? After 39 pages I wish people would stop pretending (from my side anyway) that the argument is not about the scientific method , and how people who hold faith beliefs (for example "pancake theory" are no more credible than others (for example "controlled demolition") Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 Edited...redundant and protesting too much . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas_K Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 God bless all of the innocient people slaughtered on 9/11 !! Try to put aside the bs today and put the energy into remembering. Look how much energy has been put into this forum. What if all that could have been used to say collectively write something meaningful that could help people come together rather than be split apart by this issuie. The simple reality still remains that it did happen and the lives were lost !! These are the sort of events that should be bringing people together for a greater cause but alas it never really happens to produce much change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loburt Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 can i get promotion to the zeus/loburt/piant premiership posse? you can have my spot. it's okay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 I saw it as a quote w/out a stretch of the imagination so that's true... however it is a pretty strong case. i'd read a lot from various sites so wasn't word for word on your quote from memory. it looks bad. and this thing that zeus admits is true, could you clarify am i now in tats crew, can i get promotion to the zeus/loburt/piant premiership posse? if i stay in tat's crew does that mean i own a percentage of you? ha ha ha...Sorry I'd include you and others in that group , but they've not been active today . Actually I think it's very much in anyones imagination that in anyway I've been owned in this forum . I'm actually feeling quite smug about events . But you know if enough people decide someone is a little too cocksure , arrogant and obnoxious they might gang up and may all pat each other on the back etc...but let's not pretend we're stupid enough to think this actually makes anything they say correct . You saw it is a quote ? Well then I must admit perhaps I could have used different punctuation . It doesn't matter really as it doesn't change my argument or affect it in anyway. Whether he said it or not , that's exactly all his argument ammounts to . I don't think there was any reason to lie as that's the conclusion any sane person who read the article would come to anyway ...perhaps my crime is assuming people read the article......but lying ? Bullshit . There is a big difference ? Do you also admit however that you can see how it's not meant as a quote ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slurms Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 you can have my spot. it's okay. Yeah take his spot . I was a bit generous in the first place with that .He's actually painfully mediocre and intellectually regimented . There's no real hint of anything sparkling or original about the stuff he posts . It's all a bit dry and creatively flat , if you know what I mean . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted September 11, 2007 Report Share Posted September 11, 2007 .... The strongest case zeus is offering is that it looks like I tried to make think one thing . (A thing by the way that he admits is true...that in no way does it at all prove "pancake" theory is correct...it just tries to prove that bombs are not the only possible explanation ).... ... and this thing that zeus admits is true, could you clarify yes i can clarify: i neither confirmed nor denied what he said, i ignored the question. therefore, he is putting words in my mouth, and in effect, deliberately misrepresenting what i said. in effect, the little boy is lying again, all the while patting himself on the back for it. am i now in tats crew, can i get promotion to the zeus/loburt/piant premiership posse? if i stay in tat's crew does that mean i own a percentage of you? i'm selling my shares, i don't wanna own any.. in fact i'll *give* em to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts