Bruce551 Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 11 Jan 09, NY Times A Software Populist Who Doesn?t Do Windows By ASHLEE VANCE THEY?RE either hapless pests or the very people capable of overthrowing Windows. Take your pick. In December, hundreds of these controversial software developers gathered for one week at the Google headquarters in Mountain View, Calif. They came from all over the world, sporting many of the usual signs of software mercenaries: jeans, ponytails, unruly facial hair and bloodshot eyes. But rather than preparing to code for the highest bidder, the developers were coordinating their largely volunteer effort to try to undermine Microsoft?s Windows operating system for PCs, which generated close to $17 billion in sales last year. All the fuss at the meeting centered on something called Ubuntu and a man named Mark Shuttleworth, the charismatic 35-year-old billionaire from South Africa who functions as the spiritual and financial leader of this coding clan. Created just over four years ago, Ubuntu (pronounced oo-BOON-too) has emerged as the fastest-growing and most celebrated version of the Linux operating system, which competes with Windows primarily through its low, low price: $0. More than 10 million people are estimated to run Ubuntu today, and they represent a threat to Microsoft?s hegemony in developed countries and perhaps even more so in those regions catching up to the technology revolution. ?If we?re successful, we would fundamentally change the operating system market,? Mr. Shuttleworth said during a break at the gathering, the Ubuntu Developer Summit. ?Microsoft would need to adapt, and I don?t think that would be unhealthy.? Linux is free, but there is still money to be made for businesses flanking the operating system. Companies like I.B.M., Hewlett-Packard and Dell place Linux on more than 10 percent of the computers they sell as servers, and businesses pay the hardware makers and others, like the software sellers Red Hat and Oracle, to fix any problems and keep their Linux-based systems up to date. But Canonical, Mr. Shuttleworth?s company that makes Ubuntu, has decided to focus its near-term aspirations on the PCs used by workers and people at home. The notion of a strong Linux-based competitor to Windows and, to a lesser extent, Apple?s Mac OS X has been an enduring dream of advocates of open-source software. They champion the idea that software that can be freely altered by the masses can prove cheaper and better than proprietary code produced by stodgy corporations. Try as they might, however, Linux zealots have failed in their quest to make Linux mainstream on desktop and notebook computers. The often quirky software remains in the realm of geeks, not grandmothers. With Ubuntu, the devotees believe, things might finally be different. ?I think Ubuntu has captured people?s imaginations around the Linux desktop,? said Chris DiBona, the program manager for open-source software at Google. ?If there is a hope for the Linux desktop, it would be them.? Close to half of Google?s 20,000 employees use a slightly modified version of Ubuntu, playfully called Goobuntu. (hmmm) PEOPLE encountering Ubuntu for the first time will find it very similar to Windows. The operating system has a slick graphical interface, familiar menus and all the common desktop software: a Web browser, an e-mail program, instant-messaging software and a free suite of programs for creating documents, spreadsheets and presentations. While relatively easy to use for the technologically savvy, Ubuntu ? and all other versions of Linux ? can challenge the average user. Linux cannot run many applications created for Windows, including some of the most popular games and tax software, for example. And updates to Linux can send ripples of problems through the system, causing something as basic as a computer?s display or sound system to malfunction. Canonical has tried to smooth out many of the issues that have prevented Linux from reaching the mainstream. This attention to detail with a desktop version of Linux contrasts with the focus of the largest sellers of the operating system, Red Hat and Novell. While these companies make desktop versions, they have spent most of their time chasing the big money in data centers. As a result, Ubuntu emerged as a sort of favored nation for those idealistic software developers who viewed themselves as part of a countercultural movement. ?It is the same thing companies like Apple and Google have done well, which is build not just a community but a passionate community,? said Ian Murdock, who created an earlier version of Linux called Debian, on which Ubuntu is based. Mainstream technology companies have taken notice of the enthusiasm around Ubuntu. Dell started to sell PCs and desktops with the software in 2007, and I.B.M. more recently began making Ubuntu the basis of a software package that competes against Windows. Canonical, based in London, has more than 200 full-time employees, but its total work force stretches well beyond that, through an army of volunteers. The company paid for close to 60 volunteers to attend its developer event, considering them important contributors to the operating system. An additional 1,000 work on the Debian project and make their software available to Canonical, while 5,000 spread information about Ubuntu on the Internet. And 38,000 have signed up to translate the software into different languages. When a new version of the operating system becomes available, Ubuntu devotees pile onto the Internet, often crippling Web sites that distribute the software. And hundreds of other organizations, mostly universities, also help in the distribution. The technology research firm IDC estimates that 11 percent of American businesses have systems based on Ubuntu. That said, many of the largest Ubuntu customers have cropped up in Europe, where Microsoft?s dominance has endured intense regulatory and political scrutiny. The Macedonian education department relies on Ubuntu, providing 180,000 copies of the operating system to children, while the Spanish school system has 195,000 Ubuntu desktops. In France, the National Assembly and the Gendarmerie Nationale, the military police force, rely on Ubuntu for a combined 80,000 PCs. ?The word ?free? was very important,? said Rudy Salles, vice president of the assembly, noting that it allowed the legislature to abandon Microsoft. Without question, Ubuntu?s rapid rise has been aided by the fervor surrounding Linux. But it?s Mr. Shuttleworth and his flashy lifestyle that generate much of the attention Ubuntu receives. While he favors casual attire matching the developers?, some of his activities, including a trip to space, are hardly ordinary. ?Look, I have a very privileged life, right?? Mr. Shuttleworth said. ?I am a billionaire, bachelor, ex-cosmonaut. Life couldn?t easily be that much better. Being a Linux geek sort of brings balance to the force.? The first installment of Mr. Shuttleworth?s fortune arrived after he graduated from the University of Cape Town in 1995 with a business degree. He had been paying bills by operating a small technology consulting company, setting up Linux servers for companies to run their Web sites and other basic operations. His business leanings and technology background inspired him to try to capitalize on the rising interest in the Internet. ?I?m more of an academic than a cut-and-thrust wheeler-dealer,? he said. ?I was very interested in how the Internet was changing commerce and was determined to pursue it.? Mr. Shuttleworth decided to start a company called Thawte Consulting (pronounced like ?thought?) in 1995 that provided digital certificates, a security mechanism that browsers use to verify the identity of companies. As a 23-year-old, he visited Netscape to promote a broad standard for these certificates. Netscape, then the leading browser maker, bought into it, and Microsoft, which makes the Internet Explorer browser, followed. As dot-com mania surged, companies became interested in this profitable outfit, based in South Africa. In 1999, VeriSign, which manages a number of Internet infrastructure services, bought Thawte for $575 million. (Mr. Shuttleworth had turned down an offer of $100 million a few months earlier.) Having owned all of Thawte, Mr. Shuttleworth, the son of a surgeon and a kindergarten teacher, became very wealthy at just 26. So what?s a newly minted millionaire to do? Mr. Shuttleworth looked to the stars. Paying an estimated $20 million to Russian officials, he secured a 10-day trip to space and the International Space Station on the Soyuz TM-34 in 2002 and became the first ?Afronaut,? as the press described him. ?After selling the company, it wasn?t a blowout yachts and blondes situation,? he said. ?It was very clear that I was in a unique situation where I should choose to do things that were not possible otherwise.? In the following years, Mr. Shuttleworth set up venture capital and charitable organizations. Through investments in the United States, Africa and Europe, he says, he has amassed a fortune of more than $1 billion. He spends 90 percent of his time, however, working on Canonical, which he considers another project that challenges what?s possible. ?I have done well with investing, but it has never felt very fulfilling,? he said. ?I fear getting to the end of my life and feeling you haven?t actually built something. And to do something people thought was impossible is attractive.? CANONICAL?S model makes turning a profit difficult. Many open-source companies give away a free version of their software that has some limitations, while selling a full-fledged version along with complementary services for keeping the software up to date. Canonical gives away everything, including its top product, then hopes that companies will still turn to it for services like managing large groups of servers and desktops instead of handling everything themselves with in-house experts. Canonical also receives revenue from companies like Dell that ship computers with Ubuntu and work with it on software engineering projects like adding Linux-based features to laptops. All told, Canonical?s annual revenue is creeping toward $30 million, Mr. Shuttleworth said. That figure won?t worry Microsoft. But Mr. Shuttleworth contends that $30 million a year is self-sustaining revenue, just what he needs to finance regular Ubuntu updates. And a free operating system that pays for itself, he says, could change how people view and use the software they touch everyday. ?Are we creating world peace or fundamentally changing the world? No,? he said. ?But we could shift what people expect and the amount of innovation per dollar they expect.? Microsoft had an estimated 10,000 people working on Vista, its newest desktop operating system, for five years. The result of this multibillion-dollar investment has been a product late to market and widely panned. Canonical, meanwhile, releases a fresh version of Ubuntu every six months, adding features that capitalize on the latest advances from developers and component makers like Intel. The company?s model centers on outpacing Microsoft on both price and features aimed at new markets. ?It feels pretty clear to me that the open process produces better stuff,? Mr. Shuttleworth said. Such talk from a man willing to finance software for the masses ? and by the masses ? inspires those who see open source as more of a cause than a business model. In his spare time, Agostino Russo, for example, who works for a hedge fund at Moore Europe Capital Management in London, created a program called Wubi that allows Ubuntu to be installed on computers running Windows. ?I always thought that open source is a very important socioeconomic movement,? Mr. Russo said. Ultimately, however, parts of Mr. Shuttleworth?s venture continue to look quixotic. Linux remains rough around the edges, and Canonical?s business model seems more like charity than the next great business story. And even if the open Ubuntu proves a raging success, the operating system will largely be used to reach proprietary online services from Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and others. ?Mark is very genuine and fundamentally believes in open source,? said Matt Asay, a commentator on open-source technology and an executive at the software maker Alfresco. ?But I think he?s going to have a crisis of faith at some point.? Mr. Asay wonders if Canonical can sustain its ?give everything away? model and ?always open? ideology. Canonical shows no signs of slowing down or changing course anytime soon. ?We already have a sense of where we need to compete with Windows,? Mr. Shuttleworth said. ?Now the question is if we can create something that is stylish and stunning.? In his personal life, he continues to test what is possible, requesting that a fiber-optic connection be installed to his house on the border of London?s affluent Chelsea and South Kensington neighborhoods. ?I want to find out what it?s like to have a gigabit connection to the home,? he said. ?It is not because I need to watch porn in high-definition but because I want to see what you do differently.? He says Canonical is not just a do-gooder project by someone with the time, money and inclination to tackle Microsoft head-on. His vision is to make Ubuntu the standard for the next couple of billion people who acquire PCs. **Ubuntu may worth be a try for those ready to dump WinDoz and who can't afford a Mac. I'd like try Ubuntu on a NetBook . Also, Ubuntu will help to keep Apple on toes, good to see a realistic alternative to Microsoft and Apple. :?: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beej Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 I've been reading up on this all week, not far off IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Common based, peer production is a really interesting social phenomenon. It has even moved to production fields beyond software development (eg. production of new medicine for neglected disease, biotech research, etc.). However, it will take a few years to pass judgement on whether it is really sustainable and can compete with the traditional commercial model. The strong socialist ideology defended by some of the heads of the movement has caused a bit of a marketing issue in the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beej Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Watch the Microsoft PR budget for slander fly up when they get close. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 hmmmm. ubuntu. wiki OS. deffo would like to try it on a netbook. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 Nice article. One small but important innacuracy... "Linux cannot run many application for Windows". Actually it can run most Windows apps if you install Wine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelis Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 It's still WAY off from being intuitive enough to be used by "normal" people. They still have a long way to go. I doubt they will ever get close. Give it a go on a live CD or in VMWare or something and you'll know what I mean. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 It's still WAY off from being intuitive enough to be used by "normal" people. windoze? true, but people use it anyway for some strange reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 It's still WAY off from being intuitive enough to be used by "normal" people.They still have a long way to go. I doubt they will ever get close. Give it a go on a live CD or in VMWare or something and you'll know what I mean. The biggest problem has been installing apps. Most Linux's come with something like yum or apt-get now. This mostly solves the installation hassles. As far as user-friendly is concerned.. that used to be a big issue but I think that Linux is starting to overtake Windows on that one (certainly in my experience). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterMatlock Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 I have an old desktop collecting dust in the corner. Hardware should be more than enough to run this version of Linux. I'll have a go and see... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beej Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 I have an old desktop collecting dust in the corner. Hardware should be more than enough to run this version of Linux. I'll have a go and see... Please do, be nice to hear how it rolls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterMatlock Posted January 11, 2009 Report Share Posted January 11, 2009 I have an old desktop collecting dust in the corner. Hardware should be more than enough to run this version of Linux. I'll have a go and see... Please do, be nice to hear how it rolls. I know it'll be considerably FASTER than XP or Vista. My last Canadian employer (small telecom company) ran the entire company's email system off of a 486 running Linux. While I like Linux for being fast and not being a memory pig (like Windows), I haven't exactly been fond of the GUIs developed for the various flavors of Linux... I'll also have a go with any Windows emulation software I can find for it and see if it runs alright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 question for matlock/neo: do you need windoze emulation software to run windoze apps? in other words, is that thingy that neo is talking about a full on emulator? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterMatlock Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 question for matlock/neo:do you need windoze emulation software to run windoze apps? in other words, is that thingy that neo is talking about a full on emulator? As far as I know, there are only a couple ways to run Windows apps on Linux. Dual-boot (which isn't really running Windows apps on Linux) or use an emulator. Windows apps won't run natively in Linux. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simmo_V2.0 Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 This is an ancient internet quote that still holds up today. "Linux is only free if your time has no value". It's improved a lot but still requires a lot of futzing around to get everything working that the average Joe Sixpack can't be bothered with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 question for matlock/neo:do you need windoze emulation software to run windoze apps? in other words, is that thingy that neo is talking about a full on emulator? Wine allows you to run windows apps in Linux. The apps come up in their own windows as if they were native Linux apps. The other popular way to run windows apps under Linux is to use a virtual machine like Vmware. That gives you a window in Linux that is your windows desktop. Vmware is 100% windows compatible bcoz it actually runs windows, but it costs money. You can also dual boot, but that requires rebooting all the time. Not the best solution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 This is an ancient internet quote that still holds up today."Linux is only free if your time has no value". It's improved a lot but still requires a lot of futzing around to get everything working that the average Joe Sixpack can't be bothered with. I would say that the amount of time I've spent futzing around in Linux is probably less than the amount of time I've spent re-installing windows and trying to keep it virus free. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 question for matlock/neo:do you need windoze emulation software to run windoze apps? in other words, is that thingy that neo is talking about a full on emulator? Wine allows you to run windows apps in Linux. The apps come up in their own windows as if they were native Linux apps. The other popular way to run windows apps under Linux is to use a virtual machine like Vmware. That gives you a window in Linux that is your windows desktop. Vmware is 100% windows compatible bcoz it actually runs windows, but it costs money. You can also dual boot, but that requires rebooting all the time. Not the best solution. how good is Wine? i'm sure it's fine for stuff like word and excel but can it run a game? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 how good is Wine? i'm sure it's fine for stuff like word and excel but can it run a game? Guild Wars Counter Strike Half Life 2 SilkRoad online Day of Defeat Watchtower Library 2007 Call of Duty Live For Speed Baldur's Gate 2 Tales of the Sword Coast World of Warcraft 3 StarCraft Brood War Eve online Fallout 3 NBA Live 07 The Witcher Team Forthress 2 Command & Conquer 3 .. and many more games. It can also run most other apps. Check the app database for the details of what runs and what doesn't. http://appdb.winehq.org/ Actually I wouldn't use it for office apps, I use OpenOffice for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckyphil247 Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 WTF !!! are you guys on about ??? I thought I had this computer sh*t all worked out, TILL I opened up this thread. What a head f*ck !!! Now my confidence is all but shattered :? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MisterMatlock Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 question for matlock/neo:do you need windoze emulation software to run windoze apps? in other words, is that thingy that neo is talking about a full on emulator? Wine allows you to run windows apps in Linux. The apps come up in their own windows as if they were native Linux apps. The other popular way to run windows apps under Linux is to use a virtual machine like Vmware. That gives you a window in Linux that is your windows desktop. Vmware is 100% windows compatible bcoz it actually runs windows, but it costs money. You can also dual boot, but that requires rebooting all the time. Not the best solution. how good is Wine? i'm sure it's fine for stuff like word and excel but can it run a game? I would imagine that running it in a virtual machine would be considerably better for games. I'm downloading Ubuntu now and will give a couple games a go with both solutions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 I would imagine that running it in a virtual machine would be considerably better for games. I'm downloading Ubuntu now and will give a couple games a go with both solutions. Wine usually gives better games performance than VM's because of tighter integration with the GPU. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 I would imagine that running it in a virtual machine would be considerably better for games. I'm downloading Ubuntu now and will give a couple games a go with both solutions. Wine usually gives better games performance than VM's because of tighter integration with the GPU. good to know as i haven't been blown away by virtual machine performance on mac, but tbh i haven't tinkered with it much. going to get one of those little netbooks sooner or later, although the GPU may not be able to handle games anyway (not like i play anything besides football manager, was more of a general question). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 good to know as i haven't been blown away by virtual machine performance on mac, but tbh i haven't tinkered with it much. You can run Wine on an Intel Mac. Not sure how well it works. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zeusbheld Posted January 12, 2009 Report Share Posted January 12, 2009 good to know as i haven't been blown away by virtual machine performance on mac, but tbh i haven't tinkered with it much. You can run Wine on an Intel Mac. Not sure how well it works. what are the differences, in practical terms for non-techies, between BSD Unix (mac) and Linux? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.