NUKE WASHINGTON?

[zeusbheld]

Should America use all means to stop America from dropping the bomb? Should this include a nuclear strike? Maybe if it escalates should we "TAKE OUT" Washington

I mean suppose we take action and they retaliate with some Iraq-invasion type act and threaten more what then? Should we turn a blind eye or confron them head on?

Unlike Iraq, Washington does seem to be a real threat? Should we stop the US government before its too late or should we mind our own business and let them aqquire 'nuculear' weapons?

Just wondering what ppl really think

[pr0nmaster]

lol

class Zeusy.......!!

[ttesta]

The french will take out Washington next time another American wins the Tour-de-France ... sure ...

[DanMorgan]

I don't want to get caught-up in the pro-nuke/anti-nuke debate; it tends to

devolve into statements of religious belief. However, the environmental and

public-health implications of different energy sources is interesting. I

wonder, for example:

On a per-kWh power-plant basis, how do the occupational accident rates of

uranium, coal, oil and gas mining compare?

On a per-kWh basis, how much concrete is consumed by each technology

(including wind, etc.)? (Even if wind produces no direct CO2, concrete

kilns are fired by fossil fuels).

I have heard of at least one life-cycle study that identifies natural gas as

having the lowest total environmental impact. Nuclear also faired well, but

the renewables (including wind) came off more poorly that I would have

expected.

[zeusbheld]

Should America use all means to stop America from dropping the bomb? Should this include a nuclear strike? Maybe if it escalates should we "TAKE OUT" Washington

I mean suppose we take action and they retaliate with some Iraq-invasion type act and threaten more what then? Should we turn a blind eye or confron them head on?

Unlike Iraq, Washington does seem to be a real threat? Should we stop the US government before its too late or should we mind our own business and let them aqquire 'nuculear' weapons?

Just wondering what ppl really think

Very mildly amusing!

But actually as with the response to my post ref=Iran

The reaction is hard to believe in its absolute bias and superfical assesements. Laughable actually.

First the leader of Iran has publicly stated that he wishes to wipe Israel off the map!

The USA gave many options to both the leaders of Afghnastan and Iraq as to how to avoid a war which would result in their destruction. They stupidily refused to comply and as a result they are no more!

did you read YOUR posts in previous threads? you have zero command of logic, and instead of posting reasons, post "there are reasons."

i'm not interested in reading the rest of your alleged rebuttal until you learn to spell assessments, dinosaur and afghanistan.

and don't lecture me about bias and superficial assessments when you're at least as biased and a LOT more superficial. but hey, you're an american, you're entitled to an opinion, regardless of if it makes americans look like ignorant hillbilies....

paraphrasing sean hannity does NOT count as 'having an opinion btw....

keep up the work.

nuke em all, doc.

I asked a question but I didn not advocate any action! Up to me I would not admit that I would be content to bomb the crap out of Iran if it was just to stop them getting nukes, but Id try every other option first. As for Nuking Teheran? Hardly any senario in which I would want to do that but there are some! which I could live with.

OH. i stand corrected. you're not ADVOCATING nuking, you're just sayin' :roll:

[eagle]

Washington is working on MicroWaving us all as we speak. Setting up X corporate CEOs in top posts they are pushing for more pollution and while they admit Global Waming does exist finally they are doing little to stop it.

They are also working on poisoning us all with crappy GMO foods and Hormones pesticides ETC so they can make big bucks. A Billion man march on DC to oust them would be in order before they strike again :shock:

[zeusbheld]

who is sean hannity ? coz id be amused if i was para phrasing anyone?

ok you are questioning my 'superficiality' and you haven't heard of fox news?? do your homework.

Anyway ur distraction tactics about my typos is only evidence of u having lost the argument. You are a lot less logical and far more emotional than is helpful to your argument.

whereas you are incredibly lucid, for example your europe vs the US argument? that's a flimsy way of passing the buck. talk about distraction tactics, what you just said is tantamount to the grade-school gambit "i know you are, but what am i" or "i'm the rubber, your'e the glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you."

emotion and reason are not mutually exclusive. you can attack one or the other, but so far, your only 'victories' are in attacking my hyperactive, over-the-top rhetoric, you haven't even addressed any arguments. and lack of emotion does not make one's arguments better reasoned, just more anemic.

admittedly i didnt address the "should we nuke iran" argument--but only because i think the question is insane.

ur very good at the chepa smart ass comments, ill give u that, but otherwise u strike me as the know it all [knows very little really and unwilling to learn]who has to have the last word on be see to have the last word/s.

You can have the floor now!

right, and you are that same know it all but too lazy to hang in there long enough to have the last word.

Then take a big look in LAKE ME and see what u find.

see #1 above: same know it all but too lazy to hang in there long enough to have the last word.

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK - honest no offense but u are very amusing. We can argue over these topics with a few beers when we can.

anything that involves a few beers is alright with me. especially if you bring some decent beer when your'e in bangkok, i'm tired of the local heineken and singha. hell if you bring hoegaarden i''ll agree with EVERYTHING. consider it a contract :twisted: (ps if it's more fun when i disagree i can agree to disagree, i'm a hoegaarden ho)

[uarewotueat]

the current administration should nuke themselves, preferably by launching themselves into space first

sounds good :twisted:

[eagle]

Washington is working on MicroWaving us all as we speak. Setting up X corporate CEOs in top posts they are pushing for more pollution and while they admit Global Waming does exist finally they are doing little to stop it.

They are also working on poisoning us all with crappy GMO foods and Hormones pesticides ETC so they can make big bucks. A Billion man march on DC to oust them would be in order before they strike again :shock:

I agree with every word you write here brother! But what exactly has that to do with my previous rant? bad-mad-sad as they were?

I'll leave the point by point to Zeus , he is a Master and I enjoy his work

[vbroker]

Yep, nothing like an intelligent topic and subsequent conversation to excite and ignite the brain neurons.

[zeusbheld]

Yep, nothing like an intelligent topic and subsequent conversation to excite and ignite the brain neurons.

yep, nothing like taking something out of context to really make someone like vbroker feel like he's really smart. that's good because that means he's impressed at least one entire person. probably not more.

[beej]

Yep, nothing like an intelligent topic and subsequent conversation to excite and ignite the brain neurons.

......... shhhhhhhhhhh

[steevolution]

and more zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

to paraphrase my idol John Wayne: "The only good American, is a dead American".

long live French fries!!!

[somjai]

I would like to see you write your article in the Washington Post. Then you would be hunted. Your comment is an act of terrorism against the US Government. Have you said that in the US, the Homeland Security, FBI and CIA would have you in jail instantly. I kid you not!

[zeusbheld]

I would like to see you write your article in the Washington Post. Then you would be hunted. Your comment is an act of terrorism against the US Government. Have you said that in the US, the Homeland Security, FBI and CIA would have you in jail instantly. I kid you not!

a) i am a US citizen

it was political satire. if you care to look, it is nearly word-for-word parody of the "nuke iran" thread.

c) you have no idea what you are talking about, not even slightly. where you get your ideas is beyond me. it certainly isn't from the united states constitution or from any legal precedent, not even one.

d) english is not your mother tongue, so i'd expect you missed entirely.