Jump to content

Conspiracy vs Truth


Goodghost
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i have one michael moore full length video....very good.

alex jones is another one that is a must see, though i don't know his site.

they are DEFINATE eye openers to showing much more than meets the eye of the general public.

the movie "the tail wags the dog" is kindergarten material compared to some other things that have been exposed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If u want some more ideas (I still find the conspiracy theories complete bullsh*t, nobody could convince me of the contrary) of other members look here:

LINK 1

or

LINK 2

I'm sure some politicians/business ppl took advantage in a political or financial way out of 9/11. But that doesn't mean they r involved in it. Some authors even made bestsellers out of this conspiracy theorie and gain a lot of money with their books.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not ALL are BS.

if one is too judgemental, then one is also biased, and close minded to possibilities that might possibly be true to some degree or another.

this subject is not something to just "scratch the surface " on.

it takes years of comitted research,(and still may likely not present the 100% truth)

i subject the statement that anyone who does enough research, will tend to agree, that there is certainly more going on than meets the eye of the general public.

what you (generally)see is NOT reality.

anyone that thinks it is, is "looking at the world through rose coloured spectacles"

all else is speculation....but that is a FACT!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

not ALL are BS.

if one is too judgemental, then one is also biased, and close minded to possibilities that might possibly be true to some degree or another.

this subject is not something to just "scratch the surface " on.

it takes years of comitted research,(and still may likely not present the 100% truth)

i subject the statement that anyone who does enough research, will tend to agree, that there is certainly more going on than meets the eye of the general public.

what you (generally)see is NOT reality.

anyone that thinks it is, is "looking at the world through rose coloured spectacles"

all else is speculation....but that is a FACT!

you are talking in vague generalities and not saying anything specific. sounds more like mystical mumbo jumbo than justification for whatever conspiracy theory you're peddling at the moment.

call it 'judgmental' if you will, but i only believe things for which there is an abundance of evidence. i don't believe theories that have to throw out substantial quantities of evidence in order to fit what the perpetrator wants to believe.

an open mind doesn't mean you let people dump their garbage in it.

if you think you can make a case for a conspiracy based on evidence, have a go at it. if you can't back up your claims, i will be laughing AT you, not WITH you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The truth will always prevail.

Your thoughts please

short version: no, the truth won't always prevail. 'the truth' will hardly ever prevail. what will prevail is good, catchy stories that press people's buttons.

my favorite is the numbnuts who insists that the planes that hit the world trade center in new york were blue-screened in. amazing job those special effects artists did, several of my friends saw the planes, they blue screened 'em right into the actual sky, not just the videos.

911.truth org is slicker bullshit, but still bullshit. this topic has been done to death, as thailbel says.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you are talking in vague generalities and not saying anything specific. sounds more like mystical mumbo jumbo than justification for whatever conspiracy theory you're peddling at the moment.

it isn't my post to begin with, and i am not peddling any conspiracy theory....

if you think you can make a case for a conspiracy based on evidence, have a go at it. if you can't back up your claims, i will be laughing AT you, not WITH you.

the last part of your statement is VERY cruel. it belittles a previous journal and i know,that you know,what i am talking about.

as for the first part , i am not making ANY case for conspiracy.

i only suggest people keep their eyes open...that is the bottom line.

and i haven't seen any of the sites mentioned above....so i can't comment.

my favorite is the numbnuts who insists that the planes that hit the world trade center in new york were blue-screened in.

i have to agree with you :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real conspiracy is people that are conspiring to make make people conspire against each other.

Geoge Bush told me!

Honest! :-)

It can be seen as unadulterated truth at g.bush*t.com :-)

actually 9/11 conspiracy theories are a great beneffit--for the bush administration. it distracts people from what's really going on, and enables bush supporters to lump all opponents in with the nut jobs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So who won?

Ermmmmm... I'll get back to you :D

There are so many theories, fantastic AND believeable, about almost everything we hear.

I never actually SAW the 9/11 travesty in person, but I don't disbelieve it happened, nor the Holocaust, apparently denied by some.

As someone else has already said, unless you actually see it with your own eyes, you can only base your opinions upon hearsay and conjecture. And that doesn't necessarily mean you are wrong, but you can't genuinely argue that you are right.

Of this I am in no doubt, as my alien friends have told me. Jing naaaaaaa...

:D:D:D:D:D

actually that's not true. firstly, don't believe everything you see, although if you see a building collapse it probably did.

also, while nothing is 100 percent knowable and therefore all 'truth' is provisional, and thus subject to revision, it makes considerable sense to base one's opinion on evidence, and wherever science is applicable, it is probably our most effective technique for basing opinions on something much more reliable than hearsay or conjecture.

the problem is, science is always a work in progress. and it is also very technical, scientific education in the general public is putrid. also it can get so esoteric than only those specializing in the relevant discipline can seriously evaluate some claims.

thus it is easy to spin plausible-sounding yarns that make sense, because the public are poorly informed. 'truth' is always provisional and subject to revision, but that doesn't mean that everything is 'hearsay and conjecture.' some things are definitely more true than others.

there is no such thing as 100 percent certainty. however, if some things aren't fairly reliably testable and effectively true, don't go in a building, cross a bridge, drive a car, etc. and deny the existence of the computer you're typing this on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the last part of your statement is VERY cruel. it belittles a previous journal and i know,that you know,what i am talking about.

actually, i'd forgotten the journal, i have the memory of a goldfish.

sorry about that. as for being cruel, well.. yeah... i like being booed when i step into the ring, is that so wrong? apologies if i've crossed the line, but i merely made a conditional statement, that IF someone (you or anyone) posits nutty theories unsupported by evidence, such as the 'blue screen' theory, i am merely offering fair warning that i shall not practice my usual restraint, tact, and compassion and shall graduate from mere prick to full blown harpie.

<< don't take all net stuff so seriously, think of it more like professional wrestling, mostly for show. keep in mind that you nor i nor anyone have any real stake in internet 'debates'.>>

as for the first part , i am not making ANY case for conspiracy.

i only suggest people keep their eyes open...that is the bottom line.

always good advice, if not watched carefully bush might do something like invade iraq... WHAT??? oh. never mind.

i'm all for people keeping their eyes open and their mind open...

BUT tempered with a massive dose of thoroughness and skepticism.

and i haven't seen any of the sites mentioned above....so i can't comment.

i've seen most of the 9-11 conspiracy sites, haven't looked at all the sites listed here.

my favorite is the numbnuts who insists that the planes that hit the world trade center in new york were blue-screened in.

i have to agree with you :-)

the careful observer will note that most of the theories depend on the public's lack of general scientific knowledge and lack of interest in science. thus a theory can circulate indefinitely if it sounds plausible and presses people's buttons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched a video about the NEW WORLD ORDER

Well just how do you explain that nearly all of the Presidents of the USA are or have been a member of the Masonic order.

ANNUIT COEPTIS (it's on the US$ bill) with the pyramid of the all seeing eye.

Seems JFK wasn't a member so the driver shot him . The video clearly shows the driver turning around firing a shot that only grazes JFK, so he turns round again to fire the fatal shot,

JFK was killed at the Apex of Pyramid.

Painted in the Renaissance, the painting depicts liberty in the foreground with an archway overhead, in the background you can see Soloman's two towers.

Jachin & Boaz. Note that there are also two pyramids in the background.

A symbol of the World Trade Center?

http://www.uscrusade.com/911/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched a video about the NEW WORLD ORDER

Well just how do you explain that nearly all of the Presidents of the USA are or have been a member of the Masonic order.

ANNUIT COEPTIS (it's on the US$ bill) with the pyramid of the all seeing eye.

Seems JFK wasn't a member so the driver shot him . The video clearly shows the driver turning around firing a shot that only grazes JFK, so he turns round again to fire the fatal shot,

JFK was killed at the Apex of Pyramid.

Painted in the Renaissance, the painting depicts liberty in the foreground with an archway overhead, in the background you can see Soloman's two towers.

Jachin & Boaz. Note that there are also two pyramids in the background.

A symbol of the World Trade Center?

http://www.uscrusade.com/911/

"the video clearly shows..."

"a symbol of the world trade center...."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAA

LSD is a hell of a drug innit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ummm....having seen the Zapruder film (the film of JFK getting shot) countless times, it's perfectly clear that the driver did not turn around and shoot him.

If the driver turned around and shot him, why didn't Jackie Kennedy, John Connally, Mrs. Connally, the secret service agents and the hundreds of witnesses along the road not see that?

Oh, they were all part of the conspiracy too, I bet. Hundreds or random strangers and Jackie Kennedy were all part of it. Sure.

Please! Get real. Get a life. Do some homework and basic research. Think, for a change.

I've seen the trick with bill being folded and showing the trade center. It is not the trade center. It could be anything.

Furthermore, the engraving was made decades ago. Before there was a World Trade Center.

How do you explain that, Goodghost?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

remember when there circulated rumors especially among the black population ( rap music etc) that CIA was selling drugs in the ghettos...everyone were quick to kill that as a conspiracy theory with no chance of that being true...and now it is clearly documented that the CIA actually were involved in the drug trade in california to finance the Contras among others in Nicaragua....

it is not the biggest conspiracy theory ever...if it is to be considered one at all....but still find it highly interesting...

Yeah, thats what that article above discusses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...