Mister Moobs Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Moobs Posted October 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin_2 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LakeGeneve Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeeMarc Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin_2 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Now LG is laughing and pointing at me. Thanks...what do you have against Japanese Americans anyway, huh? You people make me sick!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Isn't 'bashing the admin' some sort of euphemism?? :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin_2 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Isn't 'bashing the admin' some sort of euphemism?? :? Doublespeak? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Isn't 'bashing the admin' some sort of euphemism?? :? Doublespeak? parseltongue?? :? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin_2 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Isn't 'bashing the admin' some sort of euphemism?? :? Doublespeak? parseltongue?? :? cunniling...whuh? Anyway, Admin is guilty of thread hijacking. Science and religion are like oil and water. Oil me up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Isn't 'bashing the admin' some sort of euphemism?? :? Doublespeak? parseltongue?? :? cunniling...whuh? Anyway, Admin is guilty of thread hijacking. Science and religion are like oil and water. Oil me up. just a shame Kunny's (smskun) surname isn't 'Ling' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin_2 Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 And please keep the bashing of the religous folks to a minimum. One of them might respond if they aren't immediately set upon as irrational, superstitous nonces. :wink: Why do you have to single me out here, Dave? I mean, I haven't even said anything yet, and you are bashing me. Isn't 'bashing the admin' some sort of euphemism?? :? Doublespeak? parseltongue?? :? cunniling...whuh? Anyway, Admin is guilty of thread hijacking. Science and religion are like oil and water. Oil me up. just a shame Kunny's (smskun) surname isn't 'Ling' hahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beej Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Can you lot please stop offending my beliefs and culture, I'm deeply hurt, and Pam is too, so please stop aiming your evil comments at Pam, bringing her into this is just wrong and going too far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Oh c'mon Dave, don't be such a spoil sport. It's not like you never hijack others forum threads, now is it? :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted October 1, 2009 Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 personally, I think Dave should win an award for the term 'interactive senility'. Never before have 2 words summed up TF so perfectly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Moobs Posted October 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 1, 2009 Pot, FFS, I was joking back. Am I not allowed to do that? signed, Kettle P.S. I threw that FFS so that Ciaran could see the sentence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin_2 Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Pot, FFS, I was joking back. Am I not allowed to do that? signed, Kettle P.S. I threw that FFS so that Ciaran could see the sentence. Ciaran needs it written out with censor stars and all. Yes, and we were joking back at your joking back... l :shock: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beej Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 It was funny to begin with, but now I'm just getting a little concerned!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iBatch Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 just a shame Kunny's (smskun) surname isn't 'Ling' if only 'Ling' adopting me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hobbes Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 just a shame Kunny's (smskun) surname isn't 'Ling' if only 'Ling' adopting me.... And 'Us' will then be blessing that union... :twisted: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Moobs Posted October 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 Pot, FFS, I was joking back. Am I not allowed to do that? signed, Kettle P.S. I threw that FFS so that Ciaran could see the sentence. Ciaran needs it written out with censor stars and all. Yes, and we were joking back at your joking back... l :shock: I figured that one out. Nuh uh, y'all are just victimizing me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 just a shame Kunny's (smskun) surname isn't 'Ling' if only 'Ling' adopting me.... And 'Us' will then be blessing that union... :twisted: or in your native tongue you could say 'Kunny Ling ist eine schone madchen' (please excuse any grammatical mistakes Jens) :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iBatch Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 just a shame Kunny's (smskun) surname isn't 'Ling' if only 'Ling' adopting me.... And 'Us' will then be blessing that union... :twisted: or in your native tongue you could say 'Kunny Ling ist eine schone madchen' (please excuse any grammatical mistakes Jens) :wink: There ya are... the father of my unborn child. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 It was funny to begin with, but now I'm just getting a little concerned!!! I wasn't concerned but now that your concerned I've decided to jump on the concerned wagon. I just don't know anymore ? People just say ... and we should let it go, but then twice ... this means something more I know it ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeeMarc Posted October 2, 2009 Report Share Posted October 2, 2009 whats the point of this thread again? :roll: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now