SiamHotel Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 I agree that life will find a way. And it may not include us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamHotel Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Oh, look who's back. The necon sex tourist. How are the room rates now at that flea bag short time hotel on Nana you stay at? :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Vbroker is right , its all a conspiracy from those nasty liberals. Go back to sleep, wake up and make some money money Money money money money money . *****this message brought to you by the RNC***** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamHotel Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Vbroker is right , its all a conspiracy from those nasty liberals. Go back to sleep, wake up and make some money money Money money money money money. :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelis Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 It doesn't counteract the global warming, but I am starting to believe that this might be a natural phenomenon... The earth rotates on its own axis once every 24 hours... and once on it's other axis about once every 365.25 days... this creates day and night, and the 4 seasons... BUT it also VERY VERY slowly rotates on its 3rd axis... Meaning it is no longer on the same angle towards the sun (around 26 degree angle), so the northpole is more directly exposed to the sun, and all other countries are also exposed to the sun on a differnt angle... This explains why some countries get hotter every year, but also why some countries get colder (you don't hear them about those!) and it also explains why there seems to be a small shift in seasons... They seem to start a bit earlier gradually.... Any thoughts? Sorry but that's un-scientific twaddle. There is no mysterious 3rd axis. The Earth rotates about it's axis and the sun. That's two. Yes there are long term climate variations, and guess what, climate scientists already know about them. Here's a fact you can take to the bank: most climate scientists agree not only on the existence of global warming but that it is 90% likely that it's caused by us. Posting something that does not couter the existence of global warming under "Global Warming, just a hoax?" is called trolling. Trolls get flamed. Suck it up buddy. You're a ******* nitwit who just wants to be an a**hole in here and jump on the troll flaming bandwagon. The earth's axis does rotate in 26000 years, it's called procession. So ******* learn something first before you wanna jump in here and flame people you don't agree with. It makes you look even more stupid than the OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamHotel Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 global.... STUPIDITY instead :?: :!: :!: >> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neo Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 It doesn't counteract the global warming, but I am starting to believe that this might be a natural phenomenon... The earth rotates on its own axis once every 24 hours... and once on it's other axis about once every 365.25 days... this creates day and night, and the 4 seasons... BUT it also VERY VERY slowly rotates on its 3rd axis... Meaning it is no longer on the same angle towards the sun (around 26 degree angle), so the northpole is more directly exposed to the sun, and all other countries are also exposed to the sun on a differnt angle... This explains why some countries get hotter every year, but also why some countries get colder (you don't hear them about those!) and it also explains why there seems to be a small shift in seasons... They seem to start a bit earlier gradually.... Any thoughts? Sorry but that's un-scientific twaddle. There is no mysterious 3rd axis. The Earth rotates about it's axis and the sun. That's two. Yes there are long term climate variations, and guess what, climate scientists already know about them. Here's a fact you can take to the bank: most climate scientists agree not only on the existence of global warming but that it is 90% likely that it's caused by us. Posting something that does not couter the existence of global warming under "Global Warming, just a hoax?" is called trolling. Trolls get flamed. Suck it up buddy. You're a f*cking nitwit who just wants to be an a**hole in here and jump on the troll flaming bandwagon. The earth's axis does rotate in 26000 years, it's called procession. So f*cking learn something first before you wanna jump in here and flame people you don't agree with. It makes you look even more stupid than the OP. Yeah yeah, blah blah, like i care if i look stupid on this forum. Actually i do know about that, and if you want to be really accurate that's not an axis, it's complex motion generated from gravitational interactions with other heavenly bodies. And to be clear I pointed out that there are long term climate changes and scientists have actually heard of them already. The OP started a thread called "Global Warming, just a hoax?" and didn't include anything to back up that misleading and provocative title. So yes he deserves to be flamed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamHotel Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 ZzzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzzzZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz........................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SiamHotel Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 .................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 It doesn't counteract the global warming, but I am starting to believe that this might be a natural phenomenon... The earth rotates on its own axis once every 24 hours... and once on it's other axis about once every 365.25 days... this creates day and night, and the 4 seasons... BUT it also VERY VERY slowly rotates on its 3rd axis... Meaning it is no longer on the same angle towards the sun (around 26 degree angle), so the northpole is more directly exposed to the sun, and all other countries are also exposed to the sun on a differnt angle... This explains why some countries get hotter every year, but also why some countries get colder (you don't hear them about those!) and it also explains why there seems to be a small shift in seasons... They seem to start a bit earlier gradually.... Any thoughts? Sorry but that's un-scientific twaddle. There is no mysterious 3rd axis. The Earth rotates about it's axis and the sun. That's two. Yes there are long term climate variations, and guess what, climate scientists already know about them. Here's a fact you can take to the bank: most climate scientists agree not only on the existence of global warming but that it is 90% likely that it's caused by us. Posting something that does not couter the existence of global warming under "Global Warming, just a hoax?" is called trolling. Trolls get flamed. Suck it up buddy. You're a f*cking nitwit who just wants to be an a**hole in here and jump on the troll flaming bandwagon. The earth's axis does rotate in 26000 years, it's called procession. So f*cking learn something first before you wanna jump in here and flame people you don't agree with. It makes you look even more stupid than the OP. Yeah yeah, blah blah, like i care if i look stupid on this forum. Actually i do know about that, and if you want to be really accurate that's not an axis, it's complex motion generated from gravitational interactions with other heavenly bodies. And to be clear I pointed out that there are long term climate changes and scientists have actually heard of them already. The OP started a thread called "Global Warming, just a hoax?" and didn't include anything to back up that misleading and provocative title. So yes he deserves to be flamed. I'm backing Neo here; there is no 3rd axis, though Nelis was accurate on the 26,000 year cycle point (well 25,800 to be accurate) But it's called prEcession, not prOcession (I know pedantic b*stard but if you're going to argue science, at least use the right terminology) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelis Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 It doesn't counteract the global warming, but I am starting to believe that this might be a natural phenomenon... The earth rotates on its own axis once every 24 hours... and once on it's other axis about once every 365.25 days... this creates day and night, and the 4 seasons... BUT it also VERY VERY slowly rotates on its 3rd axis... Meaning it is no longer on the same angle towards the sun (around 26 degree angle), so the northpole is more directly exposed to the sun, and all other countries are also exposed to the sun on a differnt angle... This explains why some countries get hotter every year, but also why some countries get colder (you don't hear them about those!) and it also explains why there seems to be a small shift in seasons... They seem to start a bit earlier gradually.... Any thoughts? Sorry but that's un-scientific twaddle. There is no mysterious 3rd axis. The Earth rotates about it's axis and the sun. That's two. Yes there are long term climate variations, and guess what, climate scientists already know about them. Here's a fact you can take to the bank: most climate scientists agree not only on the existence of global warming but that it is 90% likely that it's caused by us. Posting something that does not couter the existence of global warming under "Global Warming, just a hoax?" is called trolling. Trolls get flamed. Suck it up buddy. You're a f*cking nitwit who just wants to be an a**hole in here and jump on the troll flaming bandwagon. The earth's axis does rotate in 26000 years, it's called procession. So f*cking learn something first before you wanna jump in here and flame people you don't agree with. It makes you look even more stupid than the OP. Yeah yeah, blah blah, like i care if i look stupid on this forum. Actually i do know about that, and if you want to be really accurate that's not an axis, it's complex motion generated from gravitational interactions with other heavenly bodies. And to be clear I pointed out that there are long term climate changes and scientists have actually heard of them already. The OP started a thread called "Global Warming, just a hoax?" and didn't include anything to back up that misleading and provocative title. So yes he deserves to be flamed. I'm backing Neo here; there is no 3rd axis, though Nelis was accurate on the 26,000 year cycle point (well 25,800 to be accurate) But it's called prEcession, not prOcession (I know pedantic b*stard but if you're going to argue science, at least use the right terminology) You're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nelis Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Especially about the pedantic bastard part Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vbroker Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Yes he is. But it's not his fault. He's under the liberal ether. That's a drug more powerful than mainline heroin. Oh, look who's back. The necon sex tourist. How are the room rates now at that flea bag short time hotel on Nana you stay at? Oh, look at the liberal journalist who's never left because he's got little better to do. The room rates and cockroaches are wonderful, thanks. WTF are you guys talking about? There's probably no-one contributing to this thread who is actually a climatologist. Probably? Actually? I'm certain NO ONE here is a climatologist. So? Ok I'll make it easy for you... I've already made it "easy" for you. Every day this ridiculous issue is being more and more discredited. As with many subjects, there are 'extremists' on both sides. And you're the just the calming voice of reason needed; no doubt. According to Peter Ward (paleontologist)... What about according to YOU? We're all baited breath waiting... I agree that life will find a way. And it may not include us. I'd question that logic now that your boys and girls captured the White House and Congress. In other words, there's sooner to be terrorist event casualties well before the first "Anthropogenic Global Warming" recorded death. Vbroker is right , its all a conspiracy from those nasty liberals. Go back to sleep, wake up and make some money money Money money money money money . *****this message brought to you by the RNC***** They are nasty pricks. BTW, Thai Stick, I'm just guessing more would agree it's far nobler to pursue wealth through trade (I mean it creates jobs and all) than it is to pursue your next weed weed Weed weed weed weed weed high. As long as oil remains sub-$60.00, the greenies will gain no traction. Why? It comes back to supply and demand. That's right you anti-Capitalist left wing nuts. At day's end you can ***** and moan all you like but it all boils down to the "invisible hand." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Naw its about makin money money money !! woohoooo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Yes he is. But it's not As with many subjects, there are 'extremists' on both sides. And you're the just the calming voice of reason needed; no doubt. Perhaps not needed, but would agree that I am being a voice of reason, certainly more so than you could ever hope to attain, being as you are from one of the polar extremities I was vilifying. The far right is as bad as the far left; often their blinkered views are so close in their ludicrousness to be scary. The radical left do sensationalise global warming and their scaremongering often borders on the hysterical, but equally the denial cadre of you and your ilk wanders into the realms of self deluding fiction previously only seen in holocaust deniers. There is suspect literature and 'studies' from both sides, and perhaps if you detached yourself from your lofty McCarthyist perch, you may see through the waffle and be able to assimilate the meaningful data from both sides and find a more accurate middle ground. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 , I'm just guessing more would agree it's far nobler to pursue wealth through trade (I mean it creates jobs and all) than it is to pursue your next weed weed Weed weed weed weed weed high. And what about where those 2 worlds collide? Since the US marijuana market is worth an estimated 113 Billion dollars annually*, surely there are many out there combining the weed weed weed weed high with a healthy dose of Adam Smith stylee market economics? *...and a potential tax income, if the market was legalised, of anywhere between 1 and 30 billion, depending on whose calculations you follow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Especially about the pedantic bastard part And proud of it! :wink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mister Moobs Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Global Warming = Al Gore's Make Believe World Wet Dream It's all a bunch of bullshit panic mongering. The Right has the warmongering all wrapped up. The left needed something. So they picked the gayest, most pansy-fied cause they could find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 , I'm just guessing more would agree it's far nobler to pursue wealth through trade (I mean it creates jobs and all) than it is to pursue your next weed weed Weed weed weed weed weed high. And what about where those 2 worlds collide? Since the US marijuana market is worth an estimated 113 Billion dollars annually*, surely there are many out there combining the weed weed weed weed high with a healthy dose of Adam Smith stylee market economics? *...and a potential tax income, if the market was legalised, of anywhere between 1 and 30 billion, depending on whose calculations you follow. Yea but lots of cash flowing in the stop the pot war. Lets keep that money flowing right ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 no pun intended..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiaranM Posted April 25, 2009 Report Share Posted April 25, 2009 Yes he is. But it's not his fault. He's under the liberal ether. That's a drug more powerful than mainline heroin. Oh, look who's back. The necon sex tourist. How are the room rates now at that flea bag short time hotel on Nana you stay at? probably cheaper now since the suicide there !! he is a f**kig classy gay though isn't he !!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beej Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 A ******* hoax? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 A f*cking hoax? the op did end his statement with a question mark, as he wished to stimulate debate and intelligent discourse on the subject... f*ck knows what he is doing on tf then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce551 Posted April 26, 2009 Report Share Posted April 26, 2009 Survey: Scientists agree human-induced global warming is real Contact: Paul Francuch [email protected] 312-996-3457 University of Illinois at Chicago Public release date: 19-Jan-2009 While the harsh winter pounding many areas of North America and Europe seemingly contradicts the fact that global warming continues unabated, a new survey finds consensus among scientists about the reality of climate change and its likely cause. A group of 3,146 earth scientists surveyed around the world overwhelmingly agree that in the past 200-plus years, mean global temperatures have been rising, and that human activity is a significant contributing factor in changing mean global temperatures. Peter Doran, University of Illinois at Chicago associate professor of earth and environmental sciences, along with former graduate student Maggie Kendall Zimmerman, conducted the survey late last year. The findings appear today in the publication Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union. In trying to overcome criticism of earlier attempts to gauge the view of earth scientists on global warming and the human impact factor, Doran and Kendall Zimmerman sought the opinion of the most complete list of earth scientists they could find, contacting more than 10,200 experts around the world listed in the 2007 edition of the American Geological Institute's Directory of Geoscience Departments. Experts in academia and government research centers were e-mailed invitations to participate in the on-line poll conducted by the website questionpro.com. Only those invited could participate and computer IP addresses of participants were recorded and used to prevent repeat voting. Questions used were reviewed by a polling expert who checked for bias in phrasing, such as suggesting an answer by the way a question was worded. The nine-question survey was short, taking just a few minutes to complete. Two questions were key: have mean global temperatures risen compared to pre-1800s levels, and has human activity been a significant factor in changing mean global temperatures. About 90 percent of the scientists agreed with the first question and 82 percent the second. In analyzing responses by sub-groups, Doran found that climatologists who are active in research showed the strongest consensus on the causes of global warming, with 97 percent agreeing humans play a role. Petroleum geologists and meteorologists were among the biggest doubters, with only 47 and 64 percent respectively believing in human involvement. Doran compared their responses to a recent poll showing only 58 percent of the public thinks human activity contributes to global warming. "The petroleum geologist response is not too surprising, but the meteorologists' is very interesting," he said. "Most members of the public think meteorologists know climate, but most of them actually study very short-term phenomenon." He was not surprised, however, by the near-unanimous agreement by climatologists. "They're the ones who study and publish on climate science. So I guess the take-home message is, the more you know about the field of climate science, the more you're likely to believe in global warming and humankind's contribution to it." Doran and Kendall Zimmerman conclude that "the debate on the authenticity of global warming and the role played by human activity is largely nonexistent among those who understand the nuances and scientific basis of long-term climate processes." The challenge now, they write, is how to effectively communicate this to policy makers and to a public that continues to mistakenly perceive debate among scientists. The question that remains before us is, what are we going to do individually and collectively to solve the problem human-induced global warming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now