Barbell Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Stramash Why are you so strongly concerned about the word "to ****"? You've got this problem? Take off a prostitute. They are fully in Thailand. Including on Koh Samui. Including political prostitutes too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 StramashWhy are you so strongly concerned about the word "to ****"? You've got this problem? Take off a prostitute. They are fully in Thailand. Including on Koh Samui. Including political prostitutes too. Borebell; as you have been told before, I am not in Thailand. As for the use of the word '****'. I will leave it to George Carlin to make my point. Perhaps one of the most interesting words in the English language today, is the word ****. Out of all of the English words which begin with the letter F, **** is the only word referred to as the "F" word, it's the one magical word. **** as most words in the english language, is derived from German, the word "fricken[?]", which means to strike. In English, **** falls into many grammatical categories. As a transitive verb, for instance. John ****-ed Shirley. As an intransitive verb, Shirley FUCKS. It's meaning's not always sexual; it can be used as an adjective, such as John's doing all the ****-ing work. As part of an adverb, Shirley talks too ****-ing much. As an adverb enhancing an adjective, Shirley is ****-ing beautiful. As a noun, I don't give a ****. As part of a word abso-*******-lutely, or in-*******-credible. And, as almost every word in the sentence, **** the ****-ing ****-ers. As you must realize, there aren't too many words with the versatility of ****. As in these examples describing situations such as fraud, I got ****-ed at the used car lot. Dismay, Aw **** it. Trouble, I guess I'm really ****-ed now. Agression, Don't **** with me buddy. Difficulty, I don't understand this ****-ing question. Inquiry, Who the **** was that? Dissatisfaction, I don't like what the **** is going on here. Incompetence, He's a ****-off. Dismissal, Why don't you go outside and play hide-and-go-**** yourself? I'm sure you can think of many more examples. With all these multi purpose applications, how can anyone be offended when you use the word? We say, use this unique, flexible word more often in your daily speech. It will identify the quality of your character immediately. Say it loudly, and proudly! **** you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbell Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Lectures on the origin of words is better read at the university where you teach. You can combine this with your ravings about "genocide" in Chechnya. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 1) Stalin's killing of over 200,000 Chechens after WWII. (and subsequent deportation of almost entire Chechen nation) 2) Over 150,000 Chechens killed since 1999, including 32,000 CHILDREN!! 3) The 1999 carpet bombing of Grozny; 90% of the city destroyed and tens of thousands dead. Your blinkered revisionist views are akin to the brainless Neo-Nazis who do not believe the holocaust occurred. Mind you, Russian politics and nationalism are a step to the right from Nazism... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Lectures on the origin of words is better read at the university where you teach. I did not mention origins anywhere; I merely quoted the late great George Carlin on the various uses of a beautiful word. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
English_Bob Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Hey. Remember when Russia was cool? No. Me either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Hey. Remember when Russia was cool?No. Me either. Oh they were for a little while, round about 1916/17. The everyone realised they has just swapped one autocracy for another... :twisted: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbell Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Starmash - yes, we are nationalists, and we will get you, book theorist! I begin antitheoristic operation! Hide out! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barbell Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 English Boob, you're not hide his envy and resentment. And your neighbor as Star-mash. Star-mash, it's time to start fighting for the independence of Scotland. Will soon begin a new economic cranch, and you have a chance to get a tranche of the national liberation struggle. hehehe Sorry for offtopic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaunitz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 .... it's time to start fighting for the independence of Scotland. ..... What for???? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 What for???? So we can ban Russians from ever visiting... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaunitz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 So we can ban Russians from ever visiting... Well, that's a valid point, I have to admit.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koolbreez Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 I have no hatred for the United States or any other country. There is a certain dislike for politicians and U.S. policy. In the U.S. there are lots of normal, self-critical of people with whom I communicate on the forums. As a rule, the ode to American politics on amerikan forums not sing Native Americans (at least part of them), but immigrants from Third World countries, the so-called "new Americans".Now about that Khatiyya fought in the American forces in Vietnam. Show me Thai army general, who has not fought in Vietnam, or who are not served the United States. It is logical, since Thailand since 1945 (after it stopped to be a puppet of Japan) is an American stooge. Any Thai general helped the United States. As with Prem, who fought against the rebels, as well as Chang-O-Cha. This was due to the foreign policy of Thailand. But now we're not talking about the past. Vietnam wins, defeated the enemy larger than Thailand - United States. Winners forgive losers. My sympathies to Khatiye only due respect to the heroism and integrity that he displayed. It does not matter - on which side he fought ever. Now - if you think I have anti-American illusions about the position of the red shirts. No, it's not, you're wrong. Thailand pro-American country, and I know that America has an effect as in the present government, and in the ranks of red shirts. As with politicians and the media, and lawyers. And naive to believe that foreign policy will change in case change regime of Thailand. That was when Thaksin (better contacts with Russia, Venezuela and Burma), but Thaksin charismatic, these persons are in the country once in several decades, and it does not apply to other leaders of the red shirts which have so far not proved to be bright. My negative attitude towards the government Vejjajiva due to two factors: 1) his illegitimacy and shoot people, and 2) the illegal issuance of Bout. Everything. That is a purely formal negative, on the facts. This is not some ideological hatred. In general Vejjajiva no different from other Thai politicians. And in this case, I wish him a defeat on a "friend of my enemy - my enemy," as well as on the basis of its illegitimacy and shooting to unarmed people. No more. But that's why you all so zealously supporting Vejjajiva - I do not understand. In the event of his resignation, you will not in danger. So if there is a brain in your head, you support the ex-PM that killed over 2500 unarmed people? Is this right? You also seem to be brainwashed in that reguard. It's not ok for the current legitimate government to dispurse the illegal crowd, and when shot return fire (The only person killed at Ratchaprasong was Sala Daeng), but it is ok for the ex-PM Thaksin to kill over 2500 people in one instance, and 76 down South in another instance (stacked like cord wood in the back of a truck). Your redshirt mimicing seems a little hipocritical to me. For what little brain you have left to be able to type, you seem to think Thaksin's propaganda is the truth.....HAHAHAHA. The current government isn't illigitimate...hahahahahaha. Also as a matter of fact, Thaksin personally made over $300million in the government's loan to Myanmar, that he personally illegally increased, with the stipulation that they only buy from his company, oh, but he was supposed to have no controlling interest, yet he still made the profits from his government loan....hahahahahaha. Yes, bring Thaksin back, and see how many thousands of people he kills this time. You also probably overlook the fact that Thaksin was not elected PM at the time of the coup. At that time he had appointed himself PM. His election was thrown out by his election committee for fraud, and improper reversal of the voting booths. Thaksin was in fact an illigitimate PM at the time of the coup. Get your facts straight before you spout off your made up BS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 English Boob, you're not hide his envy and resentment. And your neighbor as Star-mash. Star-mash, it's time to start fighting for the independence of Scotland. Will soon begin a new economic cranch, and you have a chance to get a tranche of the national liberation struggle.hehehe Sorry for offtopic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Well, that's a valid point, I have to admit.... As well as Austrians... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
koolbreez Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 The government of the USA should have let General George Patton have his way during WWII, and overrun Russia. It would have eliminated allot of current problems....hahahahahahaha. kaunitz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaunitz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 As well as Austrians... Who would like to come to your rainy, muddy and cloudy piece of land where people just change between drinking whisky and beat the **** out of each other anyhow? Yeah, maybe Russians.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Who would like to come to your rainy, muddy and cloudy piece of land where people just change between drinking whisky and beat the **** out of each other anyhow?Yeah, maybe Russians.... So if we are going by skewed stereotypes, do you goose-step around your house dreaming of world domination? Or do you just lock your daughter in a cellar? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaunitz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 So if we are going by skewed stereotypes, do you goose-step around your house dreaming of world domination? Or do you just lock your daughter in a cellar? The first habit is reserved for Germans and the second is wide-spread (Belgium, USA, Argentina, Poland, Germany [again!!!],......) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 And there was me thinking Fritzl and Schicklgruber were the most famous examples... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaunitz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 And there was me thinking Fritzl and Schicklgruber were the most famous examples... Don't know why Fritzl became so famous - maybe because he lasted longest before being caught. And Schickelgruber for sure did not invent the goose-step, this is a purely Prussian invention. Austrians are far to lazy to do such things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stramash Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Austrians are far to lazy to do such things. Oh we know that; you couldn't even be bothered inventing your own energy drink so stole one from the Thais! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kaunitz Posted June 26, 2011 Report Share Posted June 26, 2011 Oh we know that; you couldn't even be bothered inventing your own energy drink so stole one from the Thais! BINGO!!! That's what we are good at and nowadays ours is even far more famous in Thailand than the original one! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loburt Posted June 27, 2011 Report Share Posted June 27, 2011 (edited) Seh Daeng didn't die fighting. He died giving an interview. I don't care who killed him or whether they're lying about it: he got what he deserved. Edited June 27, 2011 by Loburt kaunitz 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funky_house Posted July 3, 2011 Report Share Posted July 3, 2011 Does anybody know they will announce the results of the election? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.